ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Establishing usable innovations.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring successful implementation of occupational therapy led home fall-hazard reduction interventions.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
- A general framework for fidelity assessment.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The persistence of the science to service gap is evidence that evidence is not enough when defining evidence-based programs. Innovations must be developed with attention to the internal and external validity of the innovations themselves so that innovations can be replicated and scaled. This paper outlines the requirements for establishing an innovation, recommends standards for a usable innovation, and describes the usability testing processes to meet those requirements. Usability testing is a systematic process to efficiently and effectively determine the essential components and to develop a fidelity measure for an innovation. Usability testing is the foundation for research to establish the internal validity ("the basic minimum without which any experiment is uninterpretable") and external validity ("asks the question of generalizability") of the innovation itself. Once the essential components of a usable innovation are defined, measured, and linked with outcomes, implementation and scaling of usable innovations with fidelity can narrow the science to service gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.