ArticleiScience2026
Patient-derived organoid xenografts model esophageal cancer cachexia and enable assessment of anti-inflammatory drug repositioning.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is highly associated with cancer cachexia, a wasting syndrome lacking effective treatments. Existing animal models fail to capture key clinical and biological features of this condition. Here, we established a panel of patient-derived organoid xenograft (PDOX) models that authentically replicate the heterogeneity of ESCC-associated cachexia in immunodeficient mice. PDOX lines exhibited slow tumor growth compared with traditional ESCC xenografts. Heterogeneous cachexia phenotypes in PDOX-bearing mice, as compared with non-tumor-bearing mice, including body weight loss, reduction in adipose tissue, reduced grip strength, and elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, were observed. Using this platform, we tested two macrophage-targeting interventions: 10 mg/kg/day rosiglitazone, a PPAR-γ agonist, and 40 mg/kg/day pexidartinib (PLX3397), a CSF1R inhibitor. Both drugs significantly attenuated cachexia-associated functional decline and systemic inflammation. Transcriptomic analyses confirmed suppression of pro-cachectic cytokine signaling. This study presents a clinically relevant platform for preclinical cachexia research and supports macrophage modulation as a potential anti-cachexia strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.