ArticleiScience2026
Shared early processing of distinct tactile features.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extent to which spatial tactile properties share neural pathways remains unclear, yet it is the key to understanding how the brain constructs coherent object representations from distributed spatial inputs. One basic spatial property is the perceived tactile distance between two simultaneous touches on the skin. It exhibits adaptation aftereffects: when body areas are repeatedly touched at two points, subsequently presented smaller distances are perceived as smaller than on unadapted areas. We investigated whether tactile distance adaptation influences the perception of other spatial properties, macro-scale roughness and curvature, indicating shared neural mechanisms. In experiment 1, adapting the skin to a fixed tactile distance reduced perceived roughness of subsequent gratings with smaller groove widths, as assessed through passive touch at the finger pad. This aftereffect likely originates from early cortical processing, as it is orientation-specific and independent of peripheral receptor desensitization. Experiment 2 demonstrated that curvature perception increases after adaptation to a two-point distance larger than the curve, suggesting overlap in processing pathways. Experiment 3 further supported early processing involvement, as the distance-to-roughness aftereffect did not transfer to adjacent skin regions of the same finger. Experiment 4 revealed bidirectional aftereffects: roughness adaptation also influenced distance perception. However, within-property aftereffects were stronger than cross-property effects. By revealing the existence of cross-property adaptation aftereffects with low-level characteristics, our findings provide evidence that tactile distance, roughness, and curvature share early somatosensory processing. This suggests that spatially defined properties undergo a common initial processing stage, sharing initial steps rather than existing in a hierarchical processing arrangement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.