ReviewPeerJ2026
The orchestrated interplay between DNA methylation and N6-methyladenosine modification:
Review in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA methylation (DNAme) and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) represent key mechanisms in epigenetic and epitranscriptomic regulation, respectively. While DNAme is a well-established modification, m6A has more recently emerged as a central focus of epitranscriptomic research. This review comprehensively explores the dynamic crosstalk between DNAme and m6A, addressing the molecular intricacies and functional consequences of their interplay. A systematic literature search conducted in Web of Science Core Collection identified 972 publications related to both modifications. After rigorous screening, 29 studies directly investigating interactions between DNAme and m6A were included for in-depth analysis. These interactions were systematically classified into six distinct modes: (1) DNAme-mediated regulation of m6A; (2) m6A-dependent modulation of DNAme; (3) indirect interplay mediated by intermediate factors; (4) direct bilateral regulation between DNAme and m6A; (5) cooperative targeting of common downstream genes or biological processes; and (6) co-expression patterns suggestive of functional interplay. This categorization provides a novel conceptual framework that integrates disparate mechanistic insights, highlights under-explored areas, and proposes new hypotheses for future research. By synthesizing and structuring current knowledge, this review serves as a foundational resource for understanding the complex relationship between these two modifications and facilitates the identification of novel regulatory axes in epigenomic and epitranscriptomic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.