ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Error-Tolerant Multimodal Vision-Language Models for Endodontic Triaging: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Error-Tolerant Multimodal Vision-Language Models for Endodontic Triaging: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the performance of multimodal vision-language artificial intelligence models, optimised using quantisation-aware training, in triaging endodontic treatment needs. The focus is on the ability to interpret endodontic radiographs while tolerating common image capture errors, including cone cutting, elongation, foreshortening, horizontal misalignment, over- and under-exposure and artefacts. Methods: In total 3600 dental were obtained across a 1-year period. Image augmentation techniques were applied to enhance model generalisability. Bootstrapped Language-Image Pretraining (BLIP), CLIP, Florence 2 and Paligemma multimodal models were fine-tuned using quantisation-aware training and evaluated using Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU), Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE), Metric for Evaluation of Translation with Explicit ORdering (METEOR), Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation (CIDEr) and Loss Trends and Convergence. Results: Quantisation-aware optimisation improved BLEU-4 by at least 17.3%, METEOR by at least 11.1%, ROUGE-L by at least 9.8% and CIDEr by at least 75.5% across all models. Quantisation reduced memory consumption by 87.5% while preserving diagnostic accuracy within a 0.5% error margin while correctly reproducing over 90% endodontic triage assessments made by practitioners. Conclusion: Multimodal AI demonstrates tolerance to imaging inconsistencies and is capable of accurately triaging endodontic cases with minimal computational demands, without compromising diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.