ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Effects of a transformer-based AI-based application to support incontinence-associated dermatitis and pressure injury assessment, nursing care and documentation: Controlled pilot intervention study.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Integration in Multidisciplinary Wound Management: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators in Clinical Workflows.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing an increasingly important role in nursing care, including wound management. Differentiating pressure injuries from incontinence-associated dermatitis is clinically challenging, often leading to misclassification. Although AI-based wound assessment is advancing, few models specifically address incontinence-associated dermatitis, and clinical evidence remains limited. The KIADEKU project developed and piloted a transformer-based AI app to support care for these wounds. Objective: The aim of this pilot intervention study was to assess the impact of the AI-based app on duration of wound assessment, dressing changes, documentation, nursing staff task load, and guideline adherence. Secondary aims included evaluating the AI's accuracy and app usability compared to standard systems. Design: This monocentric, non-randomized controlled study was conducted in two sequential phases: a control phase with conventional wound management, followed by an intervention phase utilizing the AI-based app. Setting and Participants: The study included 88 voluntary nurses caring for pressure injuries and incontinence-associated dermatitis in adult patients on seven participating wards of LMU Hospital. Methods: Wound care was systematically observed, and nurses completed questionnaires on task load, usability, and covariates. Outcomes were measured using standardized protocols, validated tools (NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX-LITE)) and expert-defined indicators. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, group comparisons (t-test, Mann-Whitney U test), and multivariate linear regression adjusting for covariates. An independent wound assessment validated AI-generated predictions, with accuracy evaluated using F1-scores. Results: A total of 88 wound care sessions were analysed. The intervention group had a statistically significantly longer mean duration of care and documentation (12.84 vs. 9.20 min; p = 0.002; 95 % CI: -5.59; -1.41 min) and higher guideline adherence (mean rank = 50.91 vs. 38.38; p = 0.017). Nurse task load showed no statistically significant group differences. Regression analysis identified AI app use, nurse qualification, and wound severity as statistically significant predictors of care duration, while AI use did not predict task load or guideline adherence. Usability ratings were similar to standard systems. Model performance showed high accuracy in identifying wound types, but lower accuracy in classifying their categories. Conclusions: This pilot study is the first to evaluate an AI-based app supporting nursing wound management for pressure injuries and incontinence-associated dermatitis. While the app did not reduce care duration or nurse workload, it may have potential to improve guideline adherence. Limitations included limited user experience and sample bias. Future multicentre studies with larger samples and randomized trials are needed to validate findings and support clinical integration. Registration: www.drks.de DRKS00031355. Registered 05/04/2023, first recruitment 31/05/2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.