Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41623358›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

Effects of a transformer-based AI-based application to support incontinence-associated dermatitis and pressure injury assessment, nursing care and documentation: Controlled pilot intervention study.

Hannah Pinnekamp, Vanessa Priester, Johanna Steidle, Khalid Majjouti, Alexander Brehmer, Michaela Tapp-Herrenbrück, Michael Aleithe, Jens Kleesiek, Bernadette Hosters, Uli Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hannah PinnekampLMU Hospital Munich, Nursing Department, Department of clinical nursing research and quality management, Munich, Germany.
Vanessa PriesterLMU Hospital Munich, Nursing Department, Department of clinical nursing research and quality management, Munich, Germany.
Johanna SteidleLMU Hospital Munich, Nursing Department, Department of clinical nursing research and quality management, Munich, Germany.
Khalid MajjoutiUniversity Hospital Essen, Department Nursing Development and Nursing Research, Essen, Germany.
Alexander BrehmerUniversity Hospital Essen, Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), Essen, Germany.
Michaela Tapp-HerrenbrückUniversity Hospital Essen, Department Nursing Development and Nursing Research, Essen, Germany.
Michael Aleithesciendis GmbH, Leipzig, Germany.
Jens KleesiekUniversity Hospital Essen, Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), Essen, Germany.
Bernadette HostersUniversity Hospital Essen, Department Nursing Development and Nursing Research, Essen, Germany.
Uli FischerLMU Hospital Munich, Nursing Department, Department of clinical nursing research and quality management, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing an increasingly important role in nursing care, including wound management. Differentiating pressure injuries from incontinence-associated dermatitis is clinically challenging, often leading to misclassification. Although AI-based wound assessment is advancing, few models specifically address incontinence-associated dermatitis, and clinical evidence remains limited. The KIADEKU project developed and piloted a transformer-based AI app to support care for these wounds. Objective: The aim of this pilot intervention study was to assess the impact of the AI-based app on duration of wound assessment, dressing changes, documentation, nursing staff task load, and guideline adherence. Secondary aims included evaluating the AI's accuracy and app usability compared to standard systems. Design: This monocentric, non-randomized controlled study was conducted in two sequential phases: a control phase with conventional wound management, followed by an intervention phase utilizing the AI-based app. Setting and Participants: The study included 88 voluntary nurses caring for pressure injuries and incontinence-associated dermatitis in adult patients on seven participating wards of LMU Hospital. Methods: Wound care was systematically observed, and nurses completed questionnaires on task load, usability, and covariates. Outcomes were measured using standardized protocols, validated tools (NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX-LITE)) and expert-defined indicators. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, group comparisons (t-test, Mann-Whitney U test), and multivariate linear regression adjusting for covariates. An independent wound assessment validated AI-generated predictions, with accuracy evaluated using F1-scores. Results: A total of 88 wound care sessions were analysed. The intervention group had a statistically significantly longer mean duration of care and documentation (12.84 vs. 9.20 min; p = 0.002; 95 % CI: -5.59; -1.41 min) and higher guideline adherence (mean rank = 50.91 vs. 38.38; p = 0.017). Nurse task load showed no statistically significant group differences. Regression analysis identified AI app use, nurse qualification, and wound severity as statistically significant predictors of care duration, while AI use did not predict task load or guideline adherence. Usability ratings were similar to standard systems. Model performance showed high accuracy in identifying wound types, but lower accuracy in classifying their categories. Conclusions: This pilot study is the first to evaluate an AI-based app supporting nursing wound management for pressure injuries and incontinence-associated dermatitis. While the app did not reduce care duration or nurse workload, it may have potential to improve guideline adherence. Limitations included limited user experience and sample bias. Future multicentre studies with larger samples and randomized trials are needed to validate findings and support clinical integration. Registration: www.drks.de DRKS00031355. Registered 05/04/2023, first recruitment 31/05/2023.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceFecal incontinenceGuideline adherenceIrritant dermatitisNursing processPressure InjuryUrinary incontinenceWorkload

Identifiers

PMID41623358
PMCPMC12860361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.