ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2026
Improving the Efficiency of Pediatric Spinal Fusion Precertification.
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Precertification is a method implemented by insurance to reduce unnecessary spending. Unintended consequences include time and resources used to obtain precertification or appealing a denial. There was a perceived increase in denials and peer-to-peer interactions in our pediatric spine center during 2022. This quality improvement project was developed to reduce the burden of time and resources designated to these appeals. Methods: A Pareto analysis of the causes leading to spinal fusion denials was performed. The team brainstormed and developed a key driver diagram and proposed interventions. Then standard plan-do-study-act cycles were observed to evaluate the effects of the interventions. The interventions implemented included a standardized preoperative template. Also, we altered the timing of the preoperative visit from 2 weeks prior to the procedure to at least 4 weeks prior. The initiation of the first intervention began in March 2023 followed by the preoperative visit change in May 2023. Data were collected through June of 2024. Results: The Pareto analysis showed "supporting documentation" was the top reason for spinal fusion denials followed by "not medically necessary." The first change idea initiated in March 2023 included the development of spinal fusion preoperative template. The second change idea, timing of preoperative visit from 2 weeks prior to at least 4 weeks prior, was implemented in May 2023. The median monthly denial rate fell from median 15.4% prior to May 2023 to 2.9% afterward. Conclusions: Using quality improvement methods, two change ideas, a standardized preoperative template and having the preoperative visit at least 4 weeks prior to the procedure, led to significant decreases in the number of denials and peer-to-peer interactions seen during the precertification process. By targeting the top reasons for spinal fusion denials, we reduced denials for spinal fusion thus reducing the burden of peer-to-peer calls for surgeons. Methods such as this that improve efficiency and decrease administrative obligations may help larger efforts to avoid physician burnout. Key Concepts: (1)A Pareto analysis found that "supporting documentation" and "not medically necessary" were the top cited reasons for precertification denials for pediatric spine deformity correction.(2)A preoperative template including specific verbiage and elements that insurance companies require, such as curve magnitude, smoking history, fusion levels, and inadequacy of brace treatment, helped reduce precertification denial rates.(3)The preoperative visit was moved from 2 weeks prior to the procedure to at least 4 weeks prior to give adequate time to collect necessary information for precertification.(4)Following the implementation of these two change ideas, the median monthly denial rate fell from a median 15.4% prior to May 2023 to 2.9% afterward.(5)The use of quality improvement was an effective way to decrease the monthly denial rate and ultimately decrease the administrative burden of peer-to-peers on physician and nurses. Level of Evidence: Level VI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.