ReviewJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2026
Enabling Technologies for Pedicle Screw Placement in Pediatric Spine Surgery.
Review in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enabling technologies (ETs) have increasingly been developed and used in pediatric spine surgery over the past two decades, sparking ongoing discussion about their benefits and drawbacks. Relevant literature indicates that ETs can enhance pedicle screw safety and accuracy while decreasing radiation exposure to patients and surgical staff. However, steep learning curves initially lead to longer operative times, and the costs of implementing these technologies are significant. This review explores current ETs for pediatric pedicle screw placement, assessing their utility, advantages, limitations, and practical considerations for adoption. Technologies discussed include stereotactic navigation, machine-vision navigation, robotic systems, and 3D-printed modeling systems used for pedicle screw placement. The article evaluates pedicle screw accuracy, surgical procedure time and complications, radiation exposure, surgeon safety, learning curves, costs, and technological limitations. Key Concepts: (1)ET methods for pedicle screw placement in pediatric spine surgery include stereotactic navigation, machine-vision navigation, robotic assistance, and 3D-printed drill guides.(2)Implementing ETs in pediatric spine surgery can extend operative times and bring new challenges, including high initial costs, a steep learning curve, and technical difficulties.(3)Gaining proficiency in ETs may eventually decrease operative time, improve pedicle screw placement accuracy, facilitate education, and support surgeon well-being.(4)ETs may provide significant value in complex pediatric cases with severe deformities, small pedicles, and/or challenging anatomy.(5)Ideally, best practices can be achieved through collaboration with colleagues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.