ArticleBlockchain in healthcare today2025
Optimizing Proof-of-Work for Secure Health Data Blockchain Using Compute Unified Device Architecture.
Article in Blockchain in healthcare today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a graphics processing unit (GPU)-accelerated Proof-of-Work (PoW) blockchain design tailored for secure healthcare data management. Our Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA)-optimized PoW achieves throughput improvements of approximately 5× to 100× and reduces block-formation latency compared to Central Processing Unit (CPU) mining, making blockchain practical for high-volume health records. We benchmark against standard platforms-Bitcoin, known for its robust security but slow block times; Ethereum (legacy PoW), widely adopted yet less efficient; and Hyperledger Fabric, a permissioned enterprise framework-to quantify performance gains. Empirical tests show GPU-Advanced Encryption Standard in Counter Mode (AES-CTR) processes large health-record payloads in under one second, while our PoW mining throughput improves by approximately 5×, to 100× relative to unaccelerated baselines. We also evaluate end-to-end encryption latency and discuss privacy trade-offs, including that lightweight Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) yields minimal delay, whereas fully homomorphic methods, although privacy-preserving, remain impractical for real-time permissionless blockchains and are not included in our design. We explicitly address regulatory compliance: personal health data are stored off-chain (e.g., Interplanetary File System [IPFS]), preserving the "right to erasure" via deletion of off-chain records, and we implement strict access controls to meet Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) security rules. The design includes validator selection rules that limit Sybil attacks by requiring costly work (or stake) and supports post-quantum cryptographic agility (e.g., Falcon signatures). We define our research question ("Can CUDA-accelerated PoW enable a high-performance yet compliant health data blockchain?") and hypothesize that GPU parallelism will yield substantial increases in speed. Results confirm our hypothesis: throughput and latency are significantly improved while preserving data privacy and compliance. This work makes a comprehensive contribution by detailing implementation methods, performance benchmarking, and analysis of security and legal requirements in a unified blockchain framework for healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.