Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41623322›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2026

Rising U.S. trends in HPV-positive and HPV-negative vulvar cancer in older adults, 2000-2020.

Ana Paola Mata Zetina, Sritha Rajupet, Theodore Strange, Adi Davidov, Meekoo Dhar, Lohitha Dhulipalla, Thomas Gut, Kathleen H Scarbrough, Mario R Castellanos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ana Paola Mata ZetinaTouro College of Osteopathic Medicine-Harlem, NY, United States.
Sritha RajupetDepartment of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
Theodore StrangeDepartment of Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital - Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, United States.
Adi DavidovDivision of Gynecologic, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Staten Island University Hospital - Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, United States.
Meekoo DharDivision Hematology & Oncology and, Staten Island University Hospital - Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, United States.
Lohitha DhulipallaDivision Hematology & Oncology and, Staten Island University Hospital - Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, United States.
Thomas GutDepartment of Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital - Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, United States.
Kathleen H ScarbroughDepartment of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
Mario R CastellanosAmbulatory Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital - Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate rising vulvar cancer incidence in the United States, particularly in individuals aged ≥55, and assess whether increases are driven by HPV-positive or HPV-negative disease. Methods: We analyzed vulvar cancer incidence trends from 2000 to 2020 using data from the National Cancer Institute's SEER program, covering 47.9 % of the U.S. population. Cases were classified as HPV-positive or HPV-negative, and age groups were stratified as <55, 55-64, and 65 + . Linear regression analyses assessed trends and racial/ethnic disparities, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Vulvar cancer incidence increased significantly among individuals aged ≥55 from 2000 to 2020 (p < 0.01), with both HPV-positive and HPV-negative cases contributing to this rise. The sharpest increase in HPV-positive cancers occurred in the 55-64 age group, with a 53 % increase, while HPV-negative cancers in this same group rose by 23 %. Individuals aged ≥65 also experienced increases in both subtypes, though to a lesser extent. In contrast, individuals under 55 slightly declined in HPV-positive (1.5 %) and HPV-negative (5 %) cases over the same period. Conclusion: The rising incidence of both HPV-positive and HPV-negative vulvar cancer among individuals aged ≥55 reflects shifting trends in disease burden. These findings align with prior SEER analyses showing an in situ diagnoses decline and a rise in invasive cases. In the absence of standardized screening guidelines for vulvar cancer, our results underscore the importance of continued surveillance and risk-based gynecologic evaluation strategies in older populations.

Indexed as

Cancer screeningHPV-negativeHPV-positivePelvic examsVulvar cancer

Identifiers

PMID41623322
PMCPMC12855573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.