ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2026
Rising U.S. trends in HPV-positive and HPV-negative vulvar cancer in older adults, 2000-2020.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate rising vulvar cancer incidence in the United States, particularly in individuals aged ≥55, and assess whether increases are driven by HPV-positive or HPV-negative disease. Methods: We analyzed vulvar cancer incidence trends from 2000 to 2020 using data from the National Cancer Institute's SEER program, covering 47.9 % of the U.S. population. Cases were classified as HPV-positive or HPV-negative, and age groups were stratified as <55, 55-64, and 65 + . Linear regression analyses assessed trends and racial/ethnic disparities, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Vulvar cancer incidence increased significantly among individuals aged ≥55 from 2000 to 2020 (p < 0.01), with both HPV-positive and HPV-negative cases contributing to this rise. The sharpest increase in HPV-positive cancers occurred in the 55-64 age group, with a 53 % increase, while HPV-negative cancers in this same group rose by 23 %. Individuals aged ≥65 also experienced increases in both subtypes, though to a lesser extent. In contrast, individuals under 55 slightly declined in HPV-positive (1.5 %) and HPV-negative (5 %) cases over the same period. Conclusion: The rising incidence of both HPV-positive and HPV-negative vulvar cancer among individuals aged ≥55 reflects shifting trends in disease burden. These findings align with prior SEER analyses showing an in situ diagnoses decline and a rise in invasive cases. In the absence of standardized screening guidelines for vulvar cancer, our results underscore the importance of continued surveillance and risk-based gynecologic evaluation strategies in older populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.