ArticleMolecular genetics and metabolism reports2026
Clinical expert opinion on the role of elosulfase alfa in non-ambulatory individuals with Morquio A syndrome.
Article in Molecular genetics and metabolism reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Natural History of Morquio A Syndrome.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Morquio A syndrome is associated with progressive loss of ambulatory capacity. The impact of elosulfase alfa enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), the approved treatment for Morquio A, remains understudied in non-ambulatory patients. Methods: A modified Delphi study explored international expert opinions on drivers for using elosulfase alfa in non-ambulatory patients, potential treatment benefits in this population, and strategies for monitoring treatment impact. The study consisted of an initial exploratory virtual advisory board, anonymous voting on statements, and a survey to collect additional information. Results: Ten physicians with expertise in managing patients with Morquio A participated in the study. The experts reached ≥70% agreement on 14 statements; nine statements achieved 100% agreement. They agreed that mobility should not drive decisions to initiate, continue or discontinue treatment. ERT should be considered or continued as long as the benefits outweigh the burden of treatment. The decision to discontinue ERT should be based on clinician and patient/family consensus considering clinical status, health-related quality of life, and treatment burden. Clinical experience suggests that patients who cannot complete the 6MWT can still benefit from ERT. In these patients, treatment success may be measured using assessments of pulmonary function, hand dexterity, general functionality and pain, patient-reported symptoms, and quality of life assessments. Conclusions: This explorative study offers valuable insights into drivers of ERT use in non-ambulatory patients with Morquio A, its potential benefits, and strategies for monitoring treatment outcomes in clinical practice. These findings may guide patient management, optimize treatment, and inform future research for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.