ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2026
Development of a diagnostic model for esophageal achalasia assessed by esophageal high-resolution manometry using artificial intelligence.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is an important tool for diagnosing and assessing esophageal achalasia. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted HRM image processing has the potential to aid in the diagnosis of esophageal achalasia. However, addressing the challenges associated with the 'black-box' problem is important. In the present study, an automated system that utilizes AI with class-activation maps to highlight diagnostic areas in HRM images was developed. A total of 211 HRM images, which led to the diagnosis of controls and patients with achalasia, were used to train the system using Resnet34, a convolutional neural network model. The diagnoses included normal, type I achalasia, type II achalasia, type III achalasia and hypercontractile esophagus based on the Chicago classification v3.0 for esophageal motility disorders. A gradient class activation map (Grad-CAM) technique was used. The discrimination model for the control and achalasia groups yielded a 100% correct response rate for evaluating the validation images (n=30). Grad-CAM analysis revealed that the model focused on the area around the lower esophageal sphincter pressure in type 1 achalasia for differentiation, closely aligning with expert perspectives. An AI-based HRM imaging assistance system may not only support physicians in distinguishing esophageal motility disorders with improved diagnostic accuracy but also serve as a novel tool that provides deeper clinical insights and highlights key interpretative features in HRM evaluations. Further large-scale validation is required to confirm its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.