ArticleKidney medicine2026
Conceptual Development Informing the Kidney Failure Patient Life Goals Survey.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objectives: To report on the qualitative study supporting concept elicitation and item development for a new survey assessing discussion of patient life goals (D-PaLS) for people with kidney failure (KF) on maintenance dialysis. Study Design: Three-stage qualitative data collection using a semi-structured group discussion format with an expert panel (stage 1); 2 focus groups (stage 2); and cognitive debriefing interviews (stage 3). Setting & Participants: All participants were recruited nationally in the United States to obtain a diverse convenience sample of KF patients with maintenance dialysis experience, nephrologists, and dialysis clinic staff. Analytic Approach: Qualitative analysis of major themes to support life goals concept elicitation and survey item development and revision. Results: There was strong consensus for the development of a patient life goals patient-reported outcome measure to support the alignment of patient life goals with treatment planning. Themes from stage 1 included "quality gap-life goals discussions are not happening," "how life goals inform treatment planning," and "starting the life goals conversation." In stages 2 and 3, focus group feedback related to item interpretability; mix of item type; limiting survey burden; and preserving patient anonymity. The final survey contained 8 items (6 core items and 2 check-list items). Limitations: People that volunteered for participation may reflect self-selection. Conclusions: The new D-PaLS is a brief survey that was based on extensive input from patient and clinical provider stakeholders that supported elicitation of the measure concept and item development. The D-PaLS has the potential to support shared decision-making in treatment planning for people with KF. Stakeholder support is necessary throughout patient-reported outcome measure measure development to ensure content is meaningful and captures experiences and outcomes that are important to the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.