ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Geriatric Models of Surgical Care: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo synthesise literature on hospital-based geriatric models of care for older adults undergoing surgery, examining structures, team composition, governance and nursing contributions.
designScoping review.
methodsFollowing JBI methodology, two reviewers independently screened articles against eligibility criteria (Population: adults ≥ 65 years, Concept: multidisciplinary geriatric surgical care model; Context: acute hospital settings), with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Data were extracted and charted for descriptive synthesis. DATA SOURCES: Six databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, AgeLine, Cochrane Library) searched for studies published between January 2015 and February 2025.
resultsOf 2753 records identified, 81 studies were included. Models were commonly co-managed between surgical and geriatric teams, implemented at varying surgical pathway points. Orthopaedics represented 57% of studies. Geriatricians were involved in 90% of models; 38% included advanced practice nurses or specialist gerontological nurses. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment was used in nearly half the studies, typically preoperatively. Considerable heterogeneity existed in model design, professional roles and care settings.
conclusionIntegrated geriatric perioperative care is expanding globally but remains limited outside orthopaedics. Research should shift from improvement projects to rigorous implementation for sustainable transformation, including nurse-led models. Critical examination is needed of whether current outcomes address comprehensive needs of older surgical patients or primarily optimise hospital flow. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Findings highlight opportunities to expand geriatric models beyond orthopaedics and enhance nursing roles, particularly advanced practice nurses, in delivering comprehensive perioperative care for older adults. IMPACT: Addressed the gap in understanding how geriatric models of surgical care are operationalised. Identified underutilisation of nursing expertise and limited expansion beyond orthopaedics. Will impact service design, policy development and clinical implementation for older surgical patients. REPORTING
methodAdhered to PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework Registries Network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.