ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2026
Targeting lymphatic vessels enhances bone regeneration by augmenting osteoclast activity in mouse models of amputation.
Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vascular-lymphatic dual circulation in bone health and disease: Mechanistic coupling and translational therapeutics.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- A Review of Rejuvenation Strategies Targeting Mesenchymal Stem Cell Senescence and Their Impact on Bone Health and Regeneration.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Potentials of BMSCs for regulating osteogenic-vascular-neural-lymphatic coupling in bone regeneration.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- VEGF-D-induced intraosseous lymphangiogenesis drives site-specific heterotopic bone resorption.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Breaking down to rebuild: lymphatic ablation enhances osteoclast-driven regeneration.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although mammals generally demonstrate limited regenerative capacity compared with amphibians, the digit tip retains remarkable regenerative potential, providing a useful model to study successful mammalian regeneration. This process involves coordinated immune cell activity, vascular remodeling, and tissue reconstruction, yet the molecular checkpoints controlling regenerative versus fibrotic outcomes remain poorly understood. In mammals, regeneration of the digit tip (P3) proceeds through myeloid cell migration, early osteoclast-mediated osteolysis of the distal bone, and subsequent blastema-mediated regeneration. Here we test the hypothesis that lymphatic vessels regulate regenerative capacity by modulating local immune cell dynamics and osteoclast function. Using a lymphatic system-specific reporter line, we discovered that lymphatic vessels grow toward the nail region from the ventral side of the digit during quiescence and after amputation. These lymphatics closely surround, but do not invade, the native or regenerated bone. Unexpectedly, genetic, pharmacological, and surgical inhibition of lymphangiogenesis accelerated early osteolysis through enhanced transition of myeloid cells to osteoclasts, resulting in faster and more robust regeneration. These findings reveal a mechanism linking lymphatic vessel, immune regulation, and bone remodeling, suggesting that targeted manipulation of lymphatics dynamics may enhance regenerative outcomes after musculoskeletal injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.