ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2026
Neurofilament Light Chain Concentration in the Prediction of Treatment Response in Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neurofilament Light Chain Concentration in the Prediction of Treatment Response in Multiple Sclerosis.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionManagement of multiple sclerosis (MS) revolves around timely initiation of effective disease-modifying therapy. Here we investigate the additive predictive value of age-adjusted normalised neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentrations when combined with a clinicodemographic model of treatment response.
methodsData were obtained from three sources: the University Hospital Basel, the SET cohort in Prague, and EIMS and IMSE cohorts from Sweden. NfL samples were collected within 90 days of baseline, age-adjusted and normalised using a reference population. Principal component analysis reduced the dimensionality of clinicodemographic predictors. Cox proportional hazards models estimated cumulative hazards of relapse, 6-month confirmed disability worsening and 9-month confirmed disability improvement, with and without NfL. Uno's concordance index compared prediction accuracy across pooled and treatment-specific models.
resultsThe study included 1716 individuals across three therapies: interferon β (n = 554), fingolimod (n = 307) and natalizumab (n = 369). Clinicodemographic characteristics were associated with relapse and disability outcomes. While NfL showed no association in the pooled cohort, in the natalizumab group, higher NfL predicted lower probability of disability improvement (HR = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.814-0.823). Pooled models predicted outcomes with moderate accuracy (relapse: 63.4%, disability worsening: 56.4%, improvement: 67.7%), with minimal contribution from NfL. In treatment-specific models, NfL-inclusive accuracy ranged from 51.3%-62.2% (relapse), 54.3%-60.3% (worsening) and 65%-67.9% (improvement), closely matching models without NfL.
conclusionIn well-characterised MS patients treated with interferon β, fingolimod or natalizumab, clinicodemographic information provides modest prognostic value; however, NfL adds minimal incremental utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.