Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41622862›Full record

ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026

Reprogramming Immunogenicity of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles through Sulfated Glycan Presentation.

Negin Pournoori, Heela Sarlus, Dick J Sjöström, Rohith Pavan Parvathaneni, Oommen P Varghese, Vesa P Hytönen, Robert A Harris, Per H Nilsson, Oommen P Oommen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Negin PournooriFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Heela SarlusDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Hospital, Sweden.
Dick J SjöströmLinnaeus Centre for Biomaterials Chemistry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Rohith Pavan ParvathaneniDepartment of Chemistry and Biomedicine, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Oommen P VargheseDepartment of Chemistry-Ångström Laboratory, Translational Chemical Biology Group, Division of Macromolecular Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Vesa P HytönenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Robert A HarrisDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Hospital, Sweden.
Per H NilssonLinnaeus Centre for Biomaterials Chemistry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Oommen P OommenSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 955335Opetushallitus TM-23-11880Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö 240150Vetenskapsrådet 2021-01926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heparin (HP) and dextran sulfate (DS) are well-known for their anti-thrombotic and immunomodulatory properties; however, a direct comparison of their immunological responses when used in drug delivery applications is lacking. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the immunological behavior of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) coated with HP or DS in human whole blood, primary immune cells, endothelial cells, and in vivo. Both HP-SPIONs and DS-SPIONs effectively suppressed complement activation, as shown by reduced C3bc, C3bBbP, and TCC levels. Notably, HP-SPIONs activated monocytes (CD11b) and endothelial cells (ICAM-1, CD62P/E), whereas DS-SPIONs suppressed endothelial activation. DS-SPIONs were preferentially internalized by myeloid cells (∼50% neutrophils, ∼42% macrophages, ∼55% dendritic cells), while HP-SPIONs showed significantly lower uptake (<25% dendritic cells, ∼5% neutrophils). DS-SPIONs induced an immunosuppressive, pro-healing phenotype in murine and human macrophages, whereas HP-SPIONs drove a pro-inflammatory, M1-like response. In healthy mice, intravenous DS-SPIONs elicited a modest increase in splenic immune cell populations compared to HP-SPIONs, indicating early immune engagement. Collectively, both SPIONs attenuate complement activation, indicating high biocompatibility. Based on the early immunological responses, DS-SPIONs display a pro-healing immune profile suitable for regenerative drug delivery, whereas HP-SPIONs induce pro-inflammatory responses that may be leveraged for anticancer immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Magnetic Iron Oxide NanoparticlesPolysaccharidesAnimalsComplement ActivationDextran SulfateEndothelial CellsFerric CompoundsHeparinHumansMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLDextran SulfateFerric Compoundsferric oxideHeparinPolysaccharidesdextran sulfateheparinimmunomodulatory effectsmacrophage polarizationsuperparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID41622862
PMCPMC12921550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.