ArticlePublic health nutrition2026
Mixed messages: evaluating the concurrent presence of nutrition and health claims and front-of-pack warning symbols in five food categories in Canada.
Article in Public health nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed (1) to characterise the use and prevalence of nutrition and health claims (NHC) and (2) to examine the association between NHC and the potential presence of Health Canada's front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition symbol indicating high saturated fats, sugars and/or Na on a sample of Canadian prepackaged food products.
designA cross-sectional analysis was conducted on five categories of prepackaged food products. Label components were classified using the International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) labelling taxonomy. Products' nutritional profile was evaluated using Health Canada's FOP symbol nutrient thresholds for saturated fats, sugars and Na.
settingData were obtained from the Food Quality Observatory database, collected between 2018 and 2022 from food retailers in Québec City and the Greater Montreal Area or online.
participantsA total of 2937 food products were evaluated from five food categories: breakfast cereals (
resultsOverall, 74·2 % of food products had an NHC and 28·9 % had an NHC and would require to display the FOP symbol. Food products that would require the FOP symbol were less likely to carry an NHC.
conclusionsThe results demonstrate substantial use of marketing techniques highlighting positive product attributes. Given the potential for inconsistent messaging on food products carrying NHC and the FOP symbol, these results highlight an opportunity to improve Canadian labelling regulations by restricting the use of NHC on products high in saturated fats, sugars and/or Na.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.