Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41622797›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2026

Quiescence of postharvest pathogens: a fungal inhibition process or an immune response of the unripe host fruit?

Dov B Prusky, Tong Chen, Yong Chen, Shiping Tian, Boqiang Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dov B PruskyDepartment of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, 7505101, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-4358
Tong ChenState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2456-7170
Yong ChenState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4629-9063
Shiping TianState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1837-7298
Boqiang LiState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7787-8303

Funding

CAS President's International Fellowship Initiative 2025PVA0023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postharvest pathogens can infect fresh produce both before and after harvest, by direct or wound-enhanced penetration, remaining quiescent until ripening. Biotrophic-like postharvest pathogens persist beneath host cells and can remain in a state of quiescence. They detect environmental cues and regulate quiescence through chromatin-level control and the secretion of effectors that interact with host pattern recognition receptors. By contrast, necrotrophic fungi persist between dead cells and depend more directly on nutrient availability to prime their growth and upon secretion for fungal virulence factors. During quiescence, the host also mounts specific responses, including activation of pattern recognition receptor genes, ethylene signaling (particularly in unripe fruit), and defense genes such as PR-10 and chitinases. Jasmonic acid and ethylene pathways synergistically enhance these defenses. As fruit ripens, the transition from quiescence to active necrotrophic growth is triggered, accelerating tissue decay. This activation is driven by several key factors, including weakened host defenses, decreased levels of antifungal compounds such as polyphenols, increased cell wall accessibility due to fruit softening and ripening-associated changes in signaling pathways, which alter environmental pH, carbon metabolism, and secondary metabolite production. These regulatory mechanisms collectively govern the timing and extent of fungal initiation of colonization during fruit senescence.

Indexed as

FruitFungiHost-Pathogen InteractionsPlant DiseasesPlant ImmunityEthylenesSignal TransductionethyleneEthylenesdisease resistancefruit qualitypathogenicitypostharvest diseasespreharvest diseasesstorage

Identifiers

PMID41622797
PMCPMC13000976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.