ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Optical genome mapping detects cryptic high-risk and targetable abnormalities in adult AML.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modern Concepts in Precision Targeting of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Based on Principles of Molecular Oncology.Cancers · 2026Review
- Optical genome mapping improves detection and characterisation of cytogenetic abnormalities in non-Hodgkin lymphomas.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) risk stratification relies on cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities defined by European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022. Conventional cytogenetic techniques, including chromosomal banding analysis (CBA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization, have limited resolution and may miss cryptic events. Optical genome mapping (OGM) is a genome-wide approach capable of detecting balanced and unbalanced structural variants with high resolution, potentially revealing cryptic abnormalities of diagnostic and prognostic relevance. We retrospectively studied 100 adults with newly diagnosed AML, each showing one to two cytogenetic abnormalities and lacking the World Health Organization 2022-defining rearrangements or baseline ELN adverse karyotypes. OGM was performed to evaluate additional cytogenetic abnormalities and impact on ELN 2022 risk classification. Clinical outcomes were explored descriptively. OGM detected 91.4% of abnormalities identified by CBA and provided additional information in 37% (95% confidence interval: 28%-47%) of patients. Fourteen per cent was reclassified to an unfavourable cytogenetic group, and 7.7% was reclassified to ELN 2022 adverse risk. Cryptic KMT2A and NUP98 lesions were found in 10% of cases, highlighting potential therapeutic targets. Survival analyses suggested a trend towards poorer outcomes in patients reclassified as adverse, though the small sample limits definitive conclusions. In low-complexity AML, OGM provides substantial incremental diagnostic value, detecting cryptic high-risk and targetable abnormalities, supporting its use as a complementary tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.