Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41622767›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026

Optical genome mapping detects cryptic high-risk and targetable abnormalities in adult AML.

Audrey Bidet, Elodie Laharanne, Manon Dos Santos, Anne-Charlotte De Grande, Thibaut Leguay, Arnaud Pigneux, Eric Frison, Sandrine Achard, Stéphanie Dupont-Moufakkir, Emilie Klein and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Audrey BidetCHU Bordeaux, Service d'Hématologie Biologique, Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0992-8377
Elodie LaharanneCHU Bordeaux, Service d'Hématologie Biologique, Bordeaux, France.
Manon Dos SantosCHU Bordeaux, Service d'Oncologie et d'Hématologie Pédiatrique, Bordeaux, France.
Anne-Charlotte De GrandeCHU Bordeaux, Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Bordeaux, France.
Thibaut LeguayCHU Bordeaux, Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3123-4948
Arnaud PigneuxCHU Bordeaux, Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Bordeaux, France.
Eric FrisonCHU Bordeaux, Service d'Information Médicale, Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5844-1886
Sandrine AchardCHU Bordeaux, Service d'Hématologie Biologique, Bordeaux, France.
Stéphanie Dupont-MoufakkirCHU Bordeaux, Service d'Hématologie Biologique, Bordeaux, France.
Emilie KleinCHU Bordeaux, Service d'Hématologie Biologique, Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4983-5581
Pierre-Yves DumasCHU Bordeaux, Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0119-3548

Funding

ARS Nouvelle-AquitaineCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) risk stratification relies on cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities defined by European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022. Conventional cytogenetic techniques, including chromosomal banding analysis (CBA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization, have limited resolution and may miss cryptic events. Optical genome mapping (OGM) is a genome-wide approach capable of detecting balanced and unbalanced structural variants with high resolution, potentially revealing cryptic abnormalities of diagnostic and prognostic relevance. We retrospectively studied 100 adults with newly diagnosed AML, each showing one to two cytogenetic abnormalities and lacking the World Health Organization 2022-defining rearrangements or baseline ELN adverse karyotypes. OGM was performed to evaluate additional cytogenetic abnormalities and impact on ELN 2022 risk classification. Clinical outcomes were explored descriptively. OGM detected 91.4% of abnormalities identified by CBA and provided additional information in 37% (95% confidence interval: 28%-47%) of patients. Fourteen per cent was reclassified to an unfavourable cytogenetic group, and 7.7% was reclassified to ELN 2022 adverse risk. Cryptic KMT2A and NUP98 lesions were found in 10% of cases, highlighting potential therapeutic targets. Survival analyses suggested a trend towards poorer outcomes in patients reclassified as adverse, though the small sample limits definitive conclusions. In low-complexity AML, OGM provides substantial incremental diagnostic value, detecting cryptic high-risk and targetable abnormalities, supporting its use as a complementary tool.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromosome MappingLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinPrognosisRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseKMT2A protein, humanMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia Proteinacute myeloid leukaemiaoptical genome mappingprognosisrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID41622767
PMCPMC13071487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.