Trial reportThoracic cancer2026
Open-Label Randomized Controlled Study of a Disposable Dry Seal Chest Drainage System for Safety and Efficiency in Lobectomy Patients.
Trial report in Thoracic cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLobectomy, a cornerstone in the treatment of various thoracic tumors, often requires postoperative chest drainage to prevent complications such as pneumothorax and pleural effusion. Traditional water-seal drainage systems have limitations, including inconvenience and restricted patient mobility.
methodsThis study investigated the safety and efficiency of a disposable dry seal chest drainage system compared to the traditional water-seal system in lobectomy patients. An open-label randomized controlled trial with trial registration number NCTO6410716 was conducted, including 82 patients undergoing elective three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy. The study assessed postoperative pain, functional recovery, complications such as DVT, and nursing workload.
resultsThe results showed that the disposable dry seal chest drainage system significantly reduced nursing workload (p < 0.001) and improved patient mobility, with patients in the experimental group having significantly higher finger oxygen saturation levels on postoperative day 1 (p = 0.01) and day 2 (p < 0.001) compared to the control group. The incidence of DVT during the hospital stay was also lower in the experimental group (p = 0.032). Although no significant improvement in postoperative pain scores was observed, the improved functionality and reduced nursing workload suggest potential benefits for patient care and resource management.
conclusionsThis study provides valuable insights into the potential advantages of the new drainage system and its alignment with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, supporting its use as a superior option in postoperative chest drainage management for lobectomy patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.