ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2026
Intravascular Lithotripsy to Facilitate Extraction of Very Old Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Leads.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the challenges encountered when extracting transvenous leads with long dwell times is the presence of dense calcifications encasing the leads. This is the most likely reason for failure to advance a laser extraction sheath. The Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) device is an angioplasty balloon that delivers intravascular lithotripsy and fractures calcified lesions in the vasculature, approved for use in coronary and arterial angioplasty. It has also been reported as an adjunctive tool in transvenous lead extraction.
objectiveTo report the Vanderbilt University Medical Center experience using Shockwave(r) Lithotripsy in the extraction of very old leads.
methodsWe report procedural outcomes in this retrospective single-center series of 24 patients in whom IVL was performed for pretreatment before lead extraction. To use the shockwave balloon, one must have venous access along the path of the leads. In some cases, there was venous access, and in others, a lower-risk lead was extracted first to allow for the passage of the Shockwave balloon. After IVL pretreatment, leads were extracted using conventional laser and, when necessary, mechanical tools.
resultsForty-nine total leads were extracted, with a median of 2 leads per patient and median dwell time of 16 years with a range of 4-36 years. All transvenous leads were successfully removed, and there were no significant complications. An excimer laser system (Philips, Inc.) was utilized for extraction in all cases, with a median sheath size of 14 Fr. Despite long dwell times, mechanical extraction tools were only required in 6 (12%) of the leads.
conclusionOur experience contributes to the growing body of data supporting the use of Shockwave IVL as an adjunctive measure during extraction of calcified leads with long dwell time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.