ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders
"Doing the Best I Can": Qualitative Outcomes and Participant Feedback From a Combined Communication and Counselling Treatment for Primary Progressive Aphasia.
Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Combined Speech-Language and Counseling Intervention for Primary Progressive Aphasia: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Preliminary Outcomes.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- "Doing the Best I Can": Qualitative Outcomes and Participant Feedback From a Combined Communication and Counselling Treatment for Primary Progressive Aphasia.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThere is a growing evidence base supporting the utility of restitutive speech-language treatments for individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA). In contrast, there is limited research investigating treatment approaches that offer counselling to this population. Given that people with PPA are susceptible to negative impacts on their psychosocial well-being, research is needed to address this underrepresented area of inquiry. This paper provides qualitative research findings from a pilot and feasibility study in which individuals with PPA completed a novel, telehealth-based treatment program comprising both tailored speech-language treatment and counselling (via aphasia-modified cognitive behavioural therapy).
methodsNine participants with PPA (three with nonfluent/agrammatic variant; three with logopenic variant; three with semantic variant) completed the novel treatment program. A phenomenological analysis was used at pre- and post-treatment timepoints to analyse qualitative treatment outcomes and participant-derived feedback regarding the intervention.
resultsFollowing treatment, group-level themes identified across both timepoints included Communication Difficulties, Loss, Communication Strategy Usage, and Value of Support Systems. Themes identified only at pre-treatment included Negative Emotions and Social Disconnection, while those observed only at post-treatment were Acceptance, Gratitude, and Counselling and Coping Strategy Usage. Participant-generated feedback regarding the intervention resulted in themes of Positive Life Impact of Treatment, Satisfaction with Treatment Framework, and Satisfaction with Telerehabilitation.
conclusionQualitative results from this pilot study indicate positive/adaptive themes surrounding psychosocial functioning following treatment for participants with each PPA subtype. Furthermore, participant-generated feedback reflects overall satisfaction with this holistic communication and counselling-focused treatment approach, indicating treatment acceptability. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject People with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) often experience a negative impact on their emotional well-being and quality of life. While preliminary research indicates that these individuals may benefit from personal-adjustment counselling, research is limited pertaining to psychosocial approaches in PPA. Thus, additional research is warranted to investigate the benefit, acceptability and feasibility of these interventions. What this paper adds to existing knowledge Preliminary qualitative results provide evidence that a novel treatment approach comprising communication-focused intervention and aphasia-modified cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) results in positive psychosocial outcomes amongst nine individuals with heterogeneous PPA presentations. Participant-generated feedback following treatment supports the acceptability of this combined intervention. Individuals reported satisfaction with the intervention overall and recognized the value of engaging in a program that aims to optimize both communication and emotional well-being. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Speech-language therapists/pathologists may consider incorporating counselling approaches to optimize a person with PPA's emotional health and holistically meet patient needs. Aphasia-modified CBT, provided by a speech-language therapist/pathologist, requires further investigation to ultimately determine the clinical utility of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.