Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41622477›Full record

Observational studyHemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis2026

New Hydrophilic Helixone Dialyzers as an Alternative for Hemodialysis Patients With Membrane Hypersensitivity Reactions: A Retrospective Single-Cohort Study.

Víctor Joaquín Escudero-Saiz, Elena Cuadrado-Payán, Eugenia Castellote, Roxana Buri, Higini Cao, Silvia Collado, Lida Maria Rodas, Néstor Fontseré, José Jesús Broseta, Francisco Maduell

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Víctor Joaquín Escudero-SaizNephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0411-207X
Elena Cuadrado-PayánNephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eugenia CastelloteNephrology Department, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Barcelona, Spain.
Roxana BuriNephrology Department, Hospital Figueres, Figueres, Girona, Spain.
Higini CaoNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Silvia ColladoNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Lida Maria RodasNephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Néstor FontseréNephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
José Jesús BrosetaNephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-9083
Francisco MaduellNephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1673-0353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSynthetic dialysis membranes, particularly those composed of polysulfone blended with polyvinylpyrrolidone, are commonly used in hemodialysis due to their efficiency. However, hypersensitivity reactions-often atypical and not fitting traditional type A and B classifications-have increasingly been reported. Symptoms include chest tightness, bronchospasm, oxygen desaturation, and hypotension, often without clear etiology. The need for safer alternatives has led to interest in newer dialyzer technologies, such as the hydrophilic helixone membrane which incorporates tocopherol to enhance biocompatibility.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter, retrospective observational study in four hemodialysis units in Catalonia (Spain). Thirty-one stable patients previously diagnosed with hypersensitivity to synthetic membranes and dialyzing with cellulose triacetate were switched to hydrophilic helixone (CorAL) dialyzers. Clinical data, including symptoms before and after the switch, were extracted from medical records. The primary outcome was the occurrence of adverse reactions after the transition.

resultsOf the 31 patients (mean age 70.1 ± 13.9 years), the most common symptoms at initial reaction included cutaneous (21, 67.7%), respiratory (13, 41.9%), and cardiovascular (9, 29.0%) manifestations. After switching to hydrophilic helixone, 28 patients (90.3%) had no further hypersensitivity symptoms over a mean follow-up of 5.8 ± 4.3 months. Three patients experienced mild reactions (two with pruritus, one with hypotension) and reverted to cellulose triacetate. No significant associations were found between relapse and the type of membrane or symptom profile.

conclusionsThe hydrophilic helixone membranes appear to be a safe and well-tolerated alternative for patients with a history of hypersensitivity to synthetic membranes. These findings suggest that hydrophilic helixone dialyzers may allow more patients to continue treatment with synthetic membranes without severe reactions, potentially improving biocompatibility and treatment flexibility in routine clinical practice. While the findings are promising, larger prospective studies are necessary to confirm the safety and long-term clinical benefits.

Indexed as

HypersensitivityMembranes, ArtificialRenal DialysisSulfonesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesMembranes, ArtificialSulfonescellulose triacetatehydrophilic helixonehypersensitivity reactionssynthetic dialysis membranes

Identifiers

PMID41622477
PMCPMC13067210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.