Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41622457›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2026

Opportunities to Improve Nutrition for Patients in Hospital After Discharge From an Intensive Care Unit: A Human Factors Analysis.

Sarah Vollam, Owen Gustafson, Lauren Morgan, Natalie Pattison, Hilary Thomas, Peter Watkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah VollamNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2835-6271
Owen GustafsonNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lauren MorganNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Natalie PattisonSchool of Health and, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6771-8733
Hilary ThomasCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, School of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Peter WatkinsonNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1023-3927

Funding

NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research CentreResearch for Patient Benefit Programme PB-PG-0215-36149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNutrition during hospitalisation following critical illness is fundamental to rehabilitation, but provision is often poor.

aimTo analyse the process of delivering nutrition to post-ICU patients on the ward. STUDY

designThis work forms part of a mixed methods study. In three representative UK hospitals, we conducted: a structured judgement review (SJR) of 300 patients who died following discharge from ICU; in-depth reviews of 20 survivors and 20 deaths judged to be 'probably avoidable' in the SJR; and interviews with 55 patients, family members and staff about their experiences of post-ICU ward care. We extracted nutrition provision information from the primary data. Using these data and the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM), we worked with stakeholders to map the process of delivering enteral feed to patients discharged from ICU to hospital wards.

resultsThe stakeholder meeting included a dietitian and a medical registrar from two of the three primary data collection sites, two researchers with knowledge of the primary data (with nursing and physiotherapy backgrounds) and a human factors facilitator. The FRAM revealed that providing enteral feeding on the ward is not a linear process, with three clusters of functions delivering distinct steps within the wider process: establishing the need for nasogastric feeding, the nasogastric placement cycle and nasogastric feed delivery. There are multiple points in these processes where failures in multi-professional teamwork result in the absence of the required steps to move through the processes in a timely manner. In particular, the process for confirming nasogastric tube placement risked system-related delays to feed administration, significantly affecting the volume of feed delivered to patients.

conclusionsThe FRAM identified multiple process problems affecting nutritional support that may have led to profound consequences for post-ICU patients, with multi-professional collaboration a key factor for effective delivery of timely enteral nutrition. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Improving collaborative working processes and addressing common nutritional support problems after ICU discharge could improve nutritional delivery and expedite recovery from critical illness.

trial registrationISRCTN14658054.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEnteral NutritionIntensive Care UnitsPatient DischargeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusUnited Kingdomenteral feedinghuman factorsICU recoverymixed methodsnutrition

Identifiers

PMID41622457
PMCPMC12862120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.