Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41622396›Full record

ReviewApplied microscopy2026

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek and the dawn of microscopic observation: a narrative review from Delft's lens to the modern microscope.

Hyunjeong Lee, Im Joo Rhyu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hyunjeong LeeDepartment of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Goryeodae-ro 73 (Anam-dong 5ga), Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6276-376X
Im Joo RhyuDepartment of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Goryeodae-ro 73 (Anam-dong 5ga), Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Korea. irhyu@korea.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5558-6278

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS2023-00253618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) transformed observation into science through the power of a single handmade lens. His work emerged from the visual culture of seventeenth-century Delft, where craftsmanship, optics, and artistic precision intersected. While Robert Hooke's compound microscope introduced the idea of microscopic visualization, Leeuwenhoek's single-lens instruments achieved far superior magnification and resolution by minimizing optical interfaces. Using these deceptively simple devices, he documented the first observations of free-living microorganisms, fungal hyphae, red blood cells, capillary flow, oral bacteria, and spermatozoa in more than two hundred letters to the Royal Society of London.But his investigations reached far beyond microbiology. Leeuwenhoek also examined the barbed structure of the bee sting, the ordered vessels of ash wood, and the geometric microstructure of crystals and salts-demonstrating that hidden organization pervades both living and non-living matter. These studies established microscopy as a universal investigative tool, capable of unifying biology, medicine, botany, and early materials science under a single optical principle.Leeuwenhoek's work marks one of the earliest examples of how rigorous observation can redefine scientific domains. His use of a home-crafted single lens created an empirical foundation for biological microscopy that persists to this day. The legacy of his minimalist optical design also survives in the digital age: modern clip-on smartphone microscopes and paper-based platforms such as the Foldscope reproduce the same single-lens principle through micro-optics mounted directly onto digital sensors.Three and a half centuries later, his work continues to remind us that new worlds do not emerge from new theories alone, but from new ways of seeing.

Indexed as

Blood Cells/ultrastructureCrystallography/microscopyInsecta/anatomy & histologyMicroorganisms/physiologyMicroscopes/single-lens designMicroscopes/standardsMicroscopy/historyOpticsSpermatozoa/physiology

Identifiers

PMID41622396
PMCPMC12862032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.