ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Is single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis really enough for standard OMF-surgeries?
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial Stewardship in oral and maxillofacial surgery: melting the iceberg.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAntibiotic resistance and the development of multidrug-resistant pathogens are on the rise worldwide. This is mainly due to inappropriate or excessive use of antibiotics. There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines and studies for the administration of antibiotics in OMF surgery. In this study, a new shortened antibiotic prophylaxis regimen for six standard OMFS procedures (Fracture repair, plate removal, orthognathic surgery, TUROP, ND and bone augmentation) was introduced and evaluated for clinical outcomes and feasibility. MATERIALS AND
methods856 patients were enrolled in this study. They were monitored for postoperative complications such as dehiscence, fistula, signs of clinical infection, and laboratory markers of inflammation. Subgroup analyses were performed for clinically relevant procedure categories, including fractures, plate removal, and orthognathic surgery.
resultsAfter risk adjustment, reduced-duration antibiotic prophylaxis was not associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. Furthermore, a more restrictive administration as a single shot was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (from 5.83 (± 7.92) to 4.32 (± 4.88) days (p = > 0.001)).
conclusionsA single dose of antibiotics was found to be sufficient for the oral and maxillofacial procedures evaluated. Implementation of a new policy of reduced antibiotic prophylaxis coincided with a shorter length of hospital stay. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study supports the growing body of evidence suggesting that shorter, procedure-tailored antibiotic regimens can be safe and effective, potentially reducing antimicrobial resistance and adverse drug effects without compromising surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.