Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41622359›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2026

Patient Experiences with Relapsing-Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Development of a Conceptual Model to Inform Clinical Outcome Assessment Evaluation.

Ekin Seçinti, Louise Barrett, Laure Delbecque, Margaret Hoyt, Zahava Rosenberg-Yunger, Jessica Baldasaro, Kailynn Schmidt, Jessica Mills, Stefan Cano, Chetan Gandhy and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ekin SeçintiEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA. secinti_ekin@lilly.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7794-8500
Louise BarrettModus Outcomes, Cheltenham, UK.
Laure DelbecqueEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
Margaret HoytEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
Zahava Rosenberg-YungerModus Outcomes, Cary, NC, USA.
Jessica BaldasaroModus Outcomes, Cary, NC, USA.
Kailynn SchmidtModus Outcomes, Cary, NC, USA.
Jessica MillsModus Outcomes, Cheltenham, UK.
Stefan CanoModus Outcomes, Cheltenham, UK.
Chetan GandhyEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
Sarah E CurtisEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMultiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune-mediated neurodegenerative disorder. The United States Food and Drug Administration recommends using clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to measure concepts that matter to patients in clinical trials and to document the content validity of the COAs using conceptual models of patient experience. This study aimed to explore and document the patient experience of signs, symptoms, and health-related quality of life impacts of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS) to inform future COA validation research.

methodsWe conducted a targeted literature review (TLR) and qualitative semi-structured interviews of patients with RRMS and PPMS in the United States of America (USA). Publications and interview transcripts were analyzed, synthesized, and inductively categorized to develop a conceptual model of patient experiences of RRMS and PPMS.

resultsTen publications were reviewed as part of the TLR, and 16 participants (RRMS, n = 7; PPMS, n = 9) were interviewed. Most participants reported fatigue, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, sleep disturbance, and bladder issues. Many participants experienced negative emotional, physical, and social impacts due to the disease. Most participants also described needing to rest and plan/avoid activities, as well as requiring support from their family to manage their symptoms.

conclusionThis study highlights the multidimensional burden of living with RRMS and PPMS. A provisional conceptual model was developed, harmonizing the TLR and interview findings. This conceptual model may be used to promote a better understanding of the patient experience of RRMS and PPMS and to evaluate the content validity of COAs during the development of new drug treatments.

Indexed as

Clinical outcome assessmentsConceptual modelMultiple sclerosisPatient-centered outcome researchQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41622359
PMCPMC12965953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.