ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantifying the realistic reduction potential of food waste in Swedish households.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Animal-Origin Food Waste Across Global Supply Chains: Trends, Upcycling Strategies, and Circular Economy Solutions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Household food waste is often framed as a critical challenge for food systems, yet the real potential and impact of waste reduction remain uncertain. This study assessed the prevention potential and the carbon, economic and nutrition footprints of food waste in 41 Swedish households, using data from a digital quantification system over a total of 9843 days. Results showed that 24.4% of food waste was avoidable and 7.3% was possibly avoidable, indicating a prevention potential of 31.7% in total food waste. These fractions had a joint carbon footprint of 19 kg CO2e and an economic cost of €66 per person per year. Despite its smaller volume, the possibly avoidable fraction entailed notable nutrient losses, indicating a missed opportunity for improved nutrition. Additionally, two scenarios modeling a 50% reduction in food waste indicated limited climate, economic, and nutritional benefits from halving food waste. These findings suggest that the impact from reducing food waste among Swedish households may be more limited than typically portrayed. Efforts and resources directed toward reducing food waste should therefore be weighed against, or combined with, other interventions, such as promoting dietary shifts, that may offer greater benefits for food system transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.