ArticleScientific reports2026
Heat processing compromises GMO detection in soybean-enriched biscuits.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread adoption of genetically modified (GM) crops necessitates robust detection methods, particularly for processed foods, where DNA degradation compromises analytical reliability. This study investigated the effect of industrial baking temperatures (190–210 °C) on the detectability of Roundup Ready® soybean (GTS 40-3-2) DNA in a biscuit matrix containing 0–100% GM soybean flour. Real-time PCR analyses targeted the soybean-specific lectin gene, the CaMV 35 S promoter, and the cp4 epsps transgene. The results demonstrate that thermal processing induces sequence-specific DNA degradation, which is more pronounced for the 35 S promoter and cp4 epsps sequences than for the lectin reference gene. This observation indicates that the assumption of equivalent amplification behavior between target and reference sequences—a fundamental premise of comparative qPCR approaches such as the ΔΔCq method—may not consistently hold in thermally processed matrices. Near the European Union’s 0.9% labeling threshold, such differential degradation patterns may increase the risk of false-negative results. Overall, this study demonstrates that the principal challenge in the analysis of processed foods lies not in absolute GMO quantification per se, but in the reliable interpretation of detection results under conditions of sequence-specific DNA degradation. These findings underscore the need for matrix-optimized analytical protocols tailored to processed foods and for a critical re-evaluation of current qPCR-based quantification frameworks in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.