Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41622300›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The effect of substrate and product transfer between polydisperse microdroplets on biological high-throughput screens.

T Fecker, T de Kanter, R J van Tatenhove-Pel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T FeckerDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, Delft, 2629 HZ, The Netherlands.
T de KanterDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, Delft, 2629 HZ, The Netherlands.
R J van Tatenhove-PelDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, Delft, 2629 HZ, The Netherlands. R.J.vanTatenhove-Pel@tudelft.nl.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek ENW-M2, 15507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microdroplet encapsulation of cells is a powerful tool for high-throughput biological testing. The technique is widely used in mutant selection and strain engineering, where strict compartmentalization is often required to prevent transfer of cells or molecules between droplets. While molecular transfer has been reported for fluorophores, the potential transfer of common small substrates and products, and its impact on biological outcomes, has not been elucidated. Here, using a biosensor system, we demonstrate that biologically relevant molecules such as small alcohols (e.g. ethanol) and weak acids can transfer between droplets. The transfer can alter carbon availability and pH in neighboring droplets. Ethanol, a common product in biological systems, partitions directly into the oil phase, leading to unintended cell growth in adjacent droplets. Weak acids also transfer, decreasing the pH in neighboring droplets. Our results show that the transfer of small, hydrophobic molecules, commonly found in biological systems, can significantly alter experimental outcome. These findings highlight the need for validating droplet compartmentalization in assays involving small, amphiphilic molecules and careful selection of substrates that are not likely to transfer among droplets.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysBiosensing TechniquesEmulsionsEthanolHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsEmulsionsEthanolDroplet encapsulationEmulsionsHigh-throughput screeningMicrofluidicsMolecule transfer

Identifiers

PMID41622300
PMCPMC12865034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.