ArticleScientific reports2026
Towards intelligent edge computing through reinforcement learning based offloading in public edge as a service.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) deployments face increasing challenges in meeting strict latency and cost requirements while ensuring efficient resource utilization in distributed environments. Traditional offloading often overlooks the role of intermediate regional layers and mobility, resulting in inefficiencies in real-world deployments. To address this gap, we propose Public Edge as a Service (PEaaS) as an intermediate tier and develop RegionalEdgeSimPy, a Python simulator to model and evaluate this framework. It uses a Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) scheduler that models mobility and considers multiple input parameters (e.g., network latency, cost, congestion, and energy). Tasks are first evaluated at the serving (Wireless Access Point (WAP)) for feasibility under utilization thresholds. This decision uses action masking to restrict invalid options, and a reward function that integrates latency, cost, congestion, and energy to guide optimal offloading. Simulations conducted with 10 to 3000 devices in a 10 × 10 Kilometers smart city area. Results show that PPo prioritizes Edge processing until over-utilization, after which workloads are offloaded to the nearest PEaaS, with Cloud used sparingly. On average, Edge achieves 75.8% utilization, PEaaS stabilizes near 52.9%, and Cloud remains under 1.2% when active. These findings demonstrate that the PPO scheduling significantly reduces delay, cost, and task failures, providing improved scalability for mobility in IoT big data processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.