ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Assessment of self-reported driving ability in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy: Using generic and disease-specific questionnaires.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimBilateral vestibulopathy (BV) is a rare disorder characterized by loss of vestibular function, leading to unsteadiness and blurred vision during head movements, particularly in visually challenging settings such as driving. Although difficulties with driving have been suggested in BV patients, this pilot study aims to further explore and quantify self-reported driving ability and behavior in this population using both generic and disease-specific questionnaires.
methodsTwenty adults with confirmed BV (mean age 61.6 years) were recruited from a tertiary center. Participants completed a novel disease-specific questionnaire, developed collaboratively by ENT specialists and driving research experts to identify traffic situations that are particularly challenging for patients with BV. In addition, they completed the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) and the Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory (MDSI). Participants also rated their driving competence and reported on crash involvement and traffic violations.
resultsMost patients reported little difficulty while driving in familiar daytime environments but experienced challenges during night driving, in poor weather conditions, on uneven roads, and while multitasking. Ordinary violations were the most common maladaptive behaviors per the DBQ, though errors and lapses were rare. The MDSI showed patient and careful driving styles predominated, with anxious and distress-reduction styles reported by a minority. Only one patient attributed a traffic accident to BV, and few reported recent violations.
conclusionBV patients mostly adopt safe, adaptive driving behaviors, a pattern also commonly observed among older drivers. However, specific situations requiring stable gaze and spatial orientation pose particular challenges for individuals with BV. Findings are limited by self-reporting and small sample size. Future research using objective driving assessments and control groups is needed to inform evidence-based guidelines for counseling BV patients about driving.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41622275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.