Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41622202›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2026

Pneumoperitoneum without significant bowel perforation in patients with blunt trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Emad Masuadi, Yasir Ahmed Mohammed Elhadi, Osman S Abdelhamed, Zainab M Alkharas, Linda Östlundh, Gamila Ahmed, Ashraf F Hefny

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emad Masuadi *Epidemiology and Biostatistical Consulting Unit, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box 15551, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Yasir Ahmed Mohammed ElhadiEpidemiology and Biostatistical Consulting Unit, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box 15551, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Osman S AbdelhamedColorectal Surgery Department, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, D04 T6F4, Ireland.
Zainab M AlkharasFamily Medicine Department, Dubai Health , Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Linda ÖstlundhÖrebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Gamila AhmedPublic Services & Outreach Unit, UAEU Library, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box 15551, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Ashraf F Hefny *Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box 15551, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates. ahefny@uaeu.ac.ae.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFree intraperitoneal air (FIA) after blunt trauma is traditionally considered a radiological marker of hollow viscus perforation requiring urgent laparotomy. However, emerging reports have described pneumoperitoneum without surgically meaningful bowel injury, raising concerns about unnecessary operations. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the proportion of patients with blunt trauma with computed tomography (CT)-detected FIA who had no significant bowel perforation, defined as either (1) non-therapeutic laparotomy with no identified macroscopic perforation or (2) successful nonoperative management without subsequent clinical deterioration.

methodsThis review followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020202174). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through November 13, 2025, for observational studies reporting the outcomes of patients with blunt trauma with CT-detected FIA. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled proportion of FIA cases without significant perforation. Heterogeneity was assessed using I-squared statistic (measure of heterogeneity) and τ

resultsFourteen studies comprising 8,972 patients with blunt trauma were included. Among them, 239 (2.7%) had CT-detected FIA. In the FIA subgroup, 117 patients (49.0%) had surgically confirmed bowel perforation, whereas 122 (51.0%) had no significant perforation, defined as a non-therapeutic laparotomy or a stable nonoperative clinical course. Among patients without FIA on CT, 56 of 8,733 (0.6%) had bowel perforation identified during surgery. The pooled analysis showed that 34% (95% CI 14-63%) of patients with FIA had no significant perforation. Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I-squared statistic = 80.3%, τ

conclusionA noteworthy subgroup of patients with blunt trauma with CT-detected FIA did not exhibit clinically significant bowel perforations. Although FIA remains an important radiologic warning sign, it is not an independent diagnostic indicator of significant hollow viscus injury. Clinical decision-making should integrate clinical assessment with adjunctive CT findings rather than rely on FIA alone. Owing to the rarity of FIA and limited sample sizes, larger prospective studies are required to refine the diagnostic performance of FIA and optimize selective nonoperative management strategies.

Indexed as

Intestinal PerforationPneumoperitoneumWounds, NonpenetratingHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedBlunt abdominal traumaComputed tomographyFree intraperitoneal airHollow viscus injuryNontherapeutic laparotomyPneumoperitoneumSelective nonoperative managementSystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID41622202
PMCPMC12952182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.