ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Multi-dimensional EEG analysis reveals distinct neurophysiological patterns in Alzheimer's and frontotemporal dementia.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe rising prevalence of neurodegenerative disorders, particularly Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), poses an escalating healthcare challenge worldwide. Electroencephalography (EEG) provides a promising approach for investigating underlying neural mechanisms, yet studies have shown inconsistent findings. This study implemented a comprehensive analytical framework combining spectral, nonlinear dynamics, and graph theoretical approaches to characterize EEG patterns in AD and FTD.
methodsWe analyzed EEG recordings from 36 AD patients, 23 FTD patients, and 29 healthy controls (HC), and established machine learning models with model performance evaluated using classification accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsGroup-level analyses with cluster-based correction revealed distinct and frequency-dependent EEG alterations between AD and FTD. AD was characterized by more pronounced posterior abnormalities, including increased theta activity and reduced alpha- and beta-band power, whereas FTD showed relatively intermediate changes with a more central distribution. Nonlinear dynamics analyses further indicated disease-specific alterations in signal complexity across frequency bands. Graph theoretical analysis demonstrated distinct patterns of disrupted brain organization between the two conditions. In addition, machine learning results indicated that graph theoretical measures achieved the highest classification performance in distinguishing AD from FTD, with an accuracy of 81.36%.
conclusionsThese findings delineate distinct neurophysiological profiles of AD and FTD across multiple analytical dimensions and support the relevance of graph theoretical analysis for differentiating dementia subtypes, providing a basis for further investigation of the neural mechanisms underlying AD–FTD differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.