Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41622180›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Multi-dimensional EEG analysis reveals distinct neurophysiological patterns in Alzheimer's and frontotemporal dementia.

Guiyuan Cai, Yu Shi, Junqin Ma, Xuefei Zhang, Wen Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guiyuan CaiCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 18819472809@163.com.
Yu ShiCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Junqin MaCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuefei ZhangCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wen WuCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. wuwen66@163.com.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2025M771941Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2019A1515110739Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2021A1515011042National Natural Science Foundation of China 82102645National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172526Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 2025A04J3777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rising prevalence of neurodegenerative disorders, particularly Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), poses an escalating healthcare challenge worldwide. Electroencephalography (EEG) provides a promising approach for investigating underlying neural mechanisms, yet studies have shown inconsistent findings. This study implemented a comprehensive analytical framework combining spectral, nonlinear dynamics, and graph theoretical approaches to characterize EEG patterns in AD and FTD.

methodsWe analyzed EEG recordings from 36 AD patients, 23 FTD patients, and 29 healthy controls (HC), and established machine learning models with model performance evaluated using classification accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsGroup-level analyses with cluster-based correction revealed distinct and frequency-dependent EEG alterations between AD and FTD. AD was characterized by more pronounced posterior abnormalities, including increased theta activity and reduced alpha- and beta-band power, whereas FTD showed relatively intermediate changes with a more central distribution. Nonlinear dynamics analyses further indicated disease-specific alterations in signal complexity across frequency bands. Graph theoretical analysis demonstrated distinct patterns of disrupted brain organization between the two conditions. In addition, machine learning results indicated that graph theoretical measures achieved the highest classification performance in distinguishing AD from FTD, with an accuracy of 81.36%.

conclusionsThese findings delineate distinct neurophysiological profiles of AD and FTD across multiple analytical dimensions and support the relevance of graph theoretical analysis for differentiating dementia subtypes, providing a basis for further investigation of the neural mechanisms underlying AD–FTD differentiation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseElectroencephalographyFrontotemporal DementiaAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNonlinear DynamicsAlzheimer’s diseaseElectroencephalographyFrontotemporal dementiaMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41622180
PMCPMC12947498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.