ArticleBMC oral health2026
Oral health status in conflict-affected regions of Ukraine: a cross-sectional pilot study during a humanitarian dental mission.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArmed conflict disrupts healthcare access and exacerbates oral diseases. Ukraine had high baseline caries prevalence prior to the 2022 conflict. This pilot study aimed to describe oral health status and associated factors among residents of conflict-affected Ukrainian communities during a humanitarian mission.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in April 2025 at mobile dental clinics in three communities (Korosten, Medzhybizh, Ternopil). Fifty-four participants (6 children aged 7-12, 2 adolescents aged 13-17, 46 adults aged ≥ 18) underwent oral examinations using the DMFT index (WHO criteria) by a single calibrated examiner. Intra-examiner reliability was assessed through re-evaluation of 30 consecutive patients within a one-month period (86.7% agreement rate). A translated questionnaire assessed oral hygiene practices and lifestyle factors. Descriptive and regression analyses explored factors associated with caries experience.
resultsMean DMFT was 12.65 (SD 8.10), predominantly affecting posterior teeth (9.61 vs. anterior 3.04). Age-specific analysis showed marked differences: children 3.67 (SD 2.88), adolescents 4.00 (SD 5.66), adults 14.20 (SD 7.69). The high missing teeth component among adults (mean 7.10) indicates substantial accumulated disease burden. Age was the only significant predictor of DMFT (β = 0.23, p < 0.001). Oral hygiene behaviors showed no significant association with caries outcomes.
conclusionsThis pilot study documented high caries burden among conflict-affected Ukrainian residents, with adults bearing the greatest accumulated burden. The predominance of missing teeth suggests cumulative damage reflecting both endemic disease and conflict-related care disruptions. These preliminary findings may inform targeted oral health interventions in humanitarian settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.