ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2026
Association between Early Diagnosis, Surgery and Prognosis in Patients with High-Grade Glioma: Retrospective Analysis of a Real-World Healthcare Claims Database in Japan.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-grade gliomas, especially glioblastoma, are associated with poor prognosis. We investigated the prognostic impact of first visiting a neurosurgery department or other departments among patients with high-grade gliomas in real-world clinical practice in Japan. We analyzed health insurance claims data from the Japan Medical Data Centre Claims Database for 540 patients with records of C71 (malignant neoplasm of the brain), surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide, indicative of high-grade gliomas. The median age was 54 years, 70.9% of the patients were aged <60 years, and 63.0% of the patients were male. Among 375 evaluable patients who first visited a hospital different to the one where the surgery was performed, the most common department visited was general internal medicine (43.0%); 13.0% visited a neurosurgical department. The median interval from the initial visit to surgery was 35.0 days and 19.0 days for patients who first visited a general internal medicine and a neurosurgery department, respectively. The proportions of patients who underwent surgery within 21 days of the initial visit to a general internal medicine and a neurosurgery department were 37.5% and 62.2%, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rates were numerically greater in patients who first visited a neurosurgery department (72.7%) than in patients who first visited other departments (57.7%), but not significantly (log-rank p = 0.39). Our results suggest that the treatment of high-grade gliomas was delayed if patients first visited non-neurosurgery departments, leading to poor outcomes. Our findings suggest that early neurosurgery consultation and surgery may improve the outcomes of patients with high-grade gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.