ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2026
Hospital volume stratification using stratum-specific likelihood ratios for pancreatectomy.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent literature suggests that volume-outcome associations for pancreatectomy have attenuated over time, leading some researchers to question the continued relevance of volume thresholds. However, this perceived attenuation may reflect the methodological limitations of single, binary cutoffs rather than a true weakening of the underlying relationship. Stratum-specific likelihood ratios (SSLRs) generate multiple empirically derived volume strata that may detect persistent gradients that are obscured by binary stratification. The objectives of this study were to (i) define volume strata for pancreatectomy using SSLR, (ii) assess the robustness of these strata across multiple outcomes, and (iii) examine whether the association persists in modern cohorts.
methodsPatients who underwent pancreatectomy between 2004 and 2021 were identified using the National Cancer Database. The volume strata were defined by SSLR based on the 90-day postoperative mortality. The temporal threshold stability was assessed by stratified outcome analysis (chi-squared test).
resultsOverall, 61,920 patients underwent pancreatectomy at 982 facilities with a 90-day mortality rate of 5.4%. SSLR analysis yielded 6 volume strata: ≤3, 4 to 9, 10 to 20, 21 to 47, 48 to 120, and ≥121 procedures/year with decreasing 90-day mortality (≤3: 11%; 4-9: 7.3%; 10-20: 6.1%; 21-47: 4.2%; 48-120: 3.3%; ≥121: 2.3%; P <.001). The optimized threshold of 21 procedures/year was identified based on SSLR. Temporal stratification into 5-year periods (2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2020) demonstrated persistent volume-outcome associations across volume strata (P <.001).
conclusionSSLR reveals persistent volume-outcome associations for pancreatectomy across multiple empirically derived strata, even in contemporary data. These findings suggest that reports of an attenuated volume-outcome relationship may reflect limitations of single, static cutoffs rather than true weakening of this association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.