ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Validation of a Trained AI Imaging Model for Detecting Diabetic Foot Deformities.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of a Trained AI Imaging Model for Detecting Diabetic Foot Deformities.International wound journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetes is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, contributing to complications such as cardiovascular disease, kidney failure and lower-limb amputations. Diabetic foot complications, such as structural deformities, ulceration and infection, present significant risks, necessitating early detection and intervention. This study explores the development and validation of artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis for diabetic foot screening, focusing on structural deformity identification which includes callus, hallux valgus and hammer toes, because they represent the earliest detectable visual risk markers for ulceration, preceding wound formation. Leveraging datasets comprising over 1000 healthy foot images and 215 diabetic foot deformity images, the model employed YOLOv5 for object detection, a convolutional autoencoder for anomaly detection, and DenseNet201 for anomaly classification. Initial internal validation yielded 91.1% anomaly detection accuracy, while anomaly classification accuracy improved to 88.57% following refinement. External validation using 27 participants achieved an overall accuracy of 85.2% and anomaly classification accuracy of 66.7%. Final evaluation on 35 unlabelled images demonstrated promising performance, with 88.57% accuracy, 90.47% precision and an F1 score of 86.11%. Integrated into the 'Foot at Risk' (FAR) mobile application, this AI-driven solution offers a scalable tool for early diabetic foot deformity detection. With larger dataset input for training and development, it can be utilised as an early screening tool for diabetic foot and integrated into existing community diabetic care model, facilitating timely intervention and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.