ReviewJournal of medical case reports2026
Multidisciplinary rescue of acute cardiac tamponade post VATS: a case report and review of literature.
Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute cardiac tamponade is a rare but fatal complication after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. This case is noteworthy for its novel mechanism of injury and underscores the critical importance of multidisciplinary management in achieving a successful outcome against high historical mortality rates. CASE PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old Han Chinese male underwent an uncomplicated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery right upper lobe wedge resection for lung adenocarcinoma. At 3 hours postoperatively, he developed sudden obstructive shock. Echocardiography confirmed cardiac tamponade. Emergent pericardiocentesis and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation stabilization were followed by sternotomy, which revealed a needle-like aortic perforation caused by a malformed staple that had eroded from the pulmonary staple line. The aortic injury was surgically repaired. The patient was successfully weaned from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on postoperative day 2 and extubated on day 7, making a full recovery, and was discharged on day 19.
conclusionThis case highlights a novel, delayed mechanism of staple-related vascular injury that can occur even after right-sided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. It demonstrates that rapid diagnosis, immediate pericardiocentesis, early extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and definitive surgical repair within a multidisciplinary framework are paramount for survival. This report advocates for heightened vigilance during stapling near vital structures and reinforces the lifesaving potential of a protocolized rescue approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.