ArticleMicrobiome2026
Two worlds beneath: Distinct microbial strategies of the rock-attached and planktonic subsurface biosphere.
Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Year Biofilm Formation on Granitic Surfaces Reveals Dynamic Microbial Communities in Fennoscandian Shield Deep Groundwaters.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- Groundwater microbial community structure under contrasting hydrological conditions in a sulfate-rich karst aquifer.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicroorganisms in groundwater ecosystems exist either as planktonic cells or as attached communities on aquifer rock surfaces. Attached cells outnumber planktonic ones by at least three orders of magnitude, suggesting a critical role in aquifer ecosystem function. However, particularly in consolidated carbonate aquifers, where research has predominantly focused on planktonic microbes, the metabolic potential and ecological roles of attached communities remain poorly understood.
resultsTo investigate the differences between attached and planktonic communities, we sampled the attached microbiome from passive samplers filled with crushed carbonate rock exposed to oxic and anoxic groundwater in the Hainich Critical Zone Exploratory and compared it to a previously published, extensive dataset of planktonic communities from the same aquifer ecosystem. Microbial lifestyle (attached vs. planktonic) explained more variance in community composition than redox conditions, prompting us to further investigate its role in shaping functional and activity profiles. Metagenomic analysis revealed a striking taxonomic and functional segregation: the 605 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from attached communities were dominated by Proteobacteria (358 MAGs) and were enriched in genes for biofilm formation, chemolithoautotrophy, and redox cycling (e.g., iron and sulfur metabolism). In contrast, the 891 MAGs from planktonic communities were dominated by Cand. Patescibacteria (464 MAGs) and Nitrospirota (60 MAGs) and showed lower functional versatility. Only a few genera were shared, and even closely related MAGs (> 90% average nucleotide identity) differed in assembly size and metabolic traits, demonstrating lifestyle-specific functional adaptation. Analysis of active replication indicated that the active fraction of the attached community was primarily represented by the most abundant MAGs. Planktonic communities featured a higher fraction of active MAGs compared to attached communities, but overall with lower relative abundances.
conclusionsThe high abundance, metabolic specialization, and carbon fixation potential of attached microbes suggest that they are key drivers of subsurface biogeochemical processes. Carbonate aquifers may act as much larger inorganic carbon sinks than previously estimated based on CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.