ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Prevalence and sociodemographic factors associated with hyperemesis gravidarum in pregnant women in European Arctic Russia, 2006-2018.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHyperemesis gravidarum is defined as intractable nausea and vomiting which occurs in 0.3–3% of all pregnancies. Data on hyperemesis in Russia are scarce. This study estimates the prevalence of hyperemesis gravidarum in pregnant women in two Arctic regions of European Russia.
methodsA retrospective registry-based study was used. Data were collected from two population-based birth registries between 2006 and 2018. Bivariate associations between the prevalence of hyperemesis and potential determinants were studied via chi-squared tests. To assess factors contributing to the changes in the prevalence of hyperemesis over time, logistic regression models were applied. In total, 124,538 births composed the study base.
resultsThe overall prevalence of hyperemesis was 2.4%. An inverse association was observed between maternal age and the prevalence of hyperemesis. Teenagers and women aged 20–24 years were more likely to have hyperemesis than women aged 25–29 years were (aOR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.13 − 1.55 and aOR = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.08 − 1.34, respectively). The level of education did not influence the likelihood of developing hyperemesis. Being married, being primiparous, being underweight and having a female child were associated with hyperemesis. Women who reported no smoking during pregnancy were more likely to have hyperemesis after adjustment for other studied factors.
conclusionsThe prevalence of hyperemesis in European Arctic Russia is greater than that in neighboring Nordic countries and varies over time. Changes in the prevalence of hyperemesis over time cannot be explained by changes in maternal sociodemographic characteristics during the study period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.