ArticleBMC public health2026
Testing the effects of segmented crowdsource-selected messages to improve intentions to follow colorectal cancer screening recommendations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06712901 (Social Media and Cancer Screening Information), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Social Media and Cancer Screening Information
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the United States (U.S.). CRC screening (CRCS) is an important method of cancer prevention and early detection, but often receives less public attention than other cancer and screening types. Regular CRCS is recommended for most individuals aged 45–75, though screening rates are lower than desired in the U.S. Despite similar screening rates, Black Americans experience a variety of CRC-related disparities including higher incidence and mortality rates in the United States. Research suggests Black Americans often do not receive timely follow ups to stool-based screening tests and receive lower quality endoscopic care. Effective public health communication strategies are needed to improve CRCS rates, particularly among populations experiencing disparities. The current study tests the ability of a novel approach to content generation and selection (crowdsourcing) to identify effective public health communication content. METHODS/
designThis protocol is for a five-arm, online, randomized controlled trial testing different CRCS content types among white and Black/African Americans. In total, 2,000 non-Hispanic Black (n = 1,000) and white (n = 1,000) Americans will be recruited into the trial, randomized into one of five conditions. The five conditions are based on content rankings and preferences from our previous work: (1) overall preferred content, (2) Black American preferred content, (3) white American preferred content, (4) median ranked content (i.e., “standard of care”), and (5) control/no exposure to content. The primary outcomes are intentions to adhere to CRCS recommendations and screening preferences for intentions to adhere. Secondary outcomes include likelihood of sharing information via social media and information sharing behavior. Comparisons will be examined for differences in outcomes as hypothesized, with exploratory analyses undertaken as well. The study is powered to detect a small effect, which is expected based on past research. DISCUSSION: The trial aims to determine the effectiveness of crowdsource-selected CRCS messages to improve screening intentions and likelihood of sharing information via social media. This trial takes an important step in testing an innovative and scalable approach to identify and select content to be disseminated by public health communicators.
trial registrationNCT06712901.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.