Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41620698›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Testing the effects of segmented crowdsource-selected messages to improve intentions to follow colorectal cancer screening recommendations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Andy J King, Yi Liao, Tianen Chen, Rohit Kanrar, Rumi Chunara, Drew Margolin, Dan Nettleton, Jeff Niederdeppe

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06712901 (Social Media and Cancer Screening Information), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06712901 nacompletednot on this map

Social Media and Cancer Screening Information

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2025 to 2025Enrolled2,030ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsMedian Ranked Cancer Screening Messaging, Overall Preferred Cancer Screening Messaging, Black American Preferred Cancer Screening Messaging, White American Preferred Cancer Screening Messaging, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andy J KingDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, 255 Central Campus Drive, Room 2400, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. andy.king@utah.edu.
Yi LiaoDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, 255 Central Campus Drive, Room 2400, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Tianen ChenDepartment of Communication, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CIS1040, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
Rohit KanrarDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, 2438 Osborn Dr., Snedecor Hall 1121, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Rumi ChunaraDepartment of Biostatistics, New York University, 708 Broadway, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Drew MargolinDepartment of Communication, Cornell University, 237 Mann Drive, Mann Library 498B, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Dan NettletonDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, 2438 Osborn Dr., Snedecor Hall 1121, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Jeff NiederdeppeDepartment of Communication, Cornell University, 237 Mann Drive, Mann Library 498B, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Funding

Using Natural Language Processing and Crowdsourcing to Monitor and Evaluate Public Information and Communication Disparities about Colon Cancer ScreeningR37CA259156 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Andy J King · 2021 to 2026
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA259156NCI NIH HHS R37CA259156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the United States (U.S.). CRC screening (CRCS) is an important method of cancer prevention and early detection, but often receives less public attention than other cancer and screening types. Regular CRCS is recommended for most individuals aged 45–75, though screening rates are lower than desired in the U.S. Despite similar screening rates, Black Americans experience a variety of CRC-related disparities including higher incidence and mortality rates in the United States. Research suggests Black Americans often do not receive timely follow ups to stool-based screening tests and receive lower quality endoscopic care. Effective public health communication strategies are needed to improve CRCS rates, particularly among populations experiencing disparities. The current study tests the ability of a novel approach to content generation and selection (crowdsourcing) to identify effective public health communication content. METHODS/

designThis protocol is for a five-arm, online, randomized controlled trial testing different CRCS content types among white and Black/African Americans. In total, 2,000 non-Hispanic Black (n = 1,000) and white (n = 1,000) Americans will be recruited into the trial, randomized into one of five conditions. The five conditions are based on content rankings and preferences from our previous work: (1) overall preferred content, (2) Black American preferred content, (3) white American preferred content, (4) median ranked content (i.e., “standard of care”), and (5) control/no exposure to content. The primary outcomes are intentions to adhere to CRCS recommendations and screening preferences for intentions to adhere. Secondary outcomes include likelihood of sharing information via social media and information sharing behavior. Comparisons will be examined for differences in outcomes as hypothesized, with exploratory analyses undertaken as well. The study is powered to detect a small effect, which is expected based on past research. DISCUSSION: The trial aims to determine the effectiveness of crowdsource-selected CRCS messages to improve screening intentions and likelihood of sharing information via social media. This trial takes an important step in testing an innovative and scalable approach to identify and select content to be disseminated by public health communicators.

trial registrationNCT06712901.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanColorectal NeoplasmsCrowdsourcingEarly Detection of CancerHealth CommunicationIntentionAdherence InterventionsAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignUnited StatesWhiteCancer controlCancer screeningColorectal cancerCrowdsourcingHealth communicationHealth informationHealth promotion

Identifiers

PMID41620698
PMCPMC12947398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.