Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2026
High-flow nasal oxygen versus face-mask ventilation for rapid sequence induction in non-elective surgical patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06879600 (Research on Pre-Anesthetic Blood Oxygenation Effect of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen for Emergency Surgery Patients With Full Stomachs), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Research on Pre-Anesthetic Blood Oxygenation Effect of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen for Emergency Surgery Patients With Full Stomachs
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-Flow Nasal Oxygen in Contemporary Airway Management: Enhancing Physiological Safety in Anaesthesia-A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients undergoing non-elective surgery frequently require rapid sequence induction (RSI) because of concerns related to recent oral intake, impaired gastric emptying, or uncertain fasting status. Previous randomized controlled trials have reported mixed results regarding the effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in preventing oxygen desaturation during RSI. This study evaluated the effect of HFNC compared with facemask ventilation (FMV) during RSI in a non-elective surgical population.
methodsIn this randomized controlled study, adult ASA I-II patients undergoing non-elective surgery were allocated to HFNC (100% O₂, 60 L·min⁻
resultsAmong 214 analyzed patients (107 per group), no desaturation events (SpO₂ < 94%) occurred in the HFNC group versus 12.1% in FMV (p < 0.001). HFNC yielded higher PaO₂ after preoxygenation (445.7 ± 16.8 vs. 314.2 ± 14.5 mmHg) and after intubation (405.5 ± 17.7 vs. 236.5 ± 58.5 mmHg; both p < 0.001). End-tidal oxygen concentrations were also higher with HFNC (86.0 ± 11.4% vs. 75.7 ± 12.3%; p < 0.001). CO₂ accumulation, hemodynamic variables, gastric volume, and aspiration incidence were similar between groups. Mild nasal dryness reduced comfort with HFNC, and one patient withdrew because of discomfort; overall tolerance remained acceptable.
conclusionHFNC appeared to improve oxygenation compared with FMV in this low-risk, non-elective surgical cohort. Within the limits of this physiologically stable population, HFNC was well tolerated and did not increase measured gastric or hemodynamic complications.
trial registrationClinicalTrials, NCT06879600. Retrospectively registered on 05 March 2025, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06879600 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.