Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41620663›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2026

From 'quarterback' to 'coach': the policy implications of family physicians' evolving role in team-based care.

Myles Leslie, Anita McDonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Myles LeslieSchool of Public Policy and Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. myles.leslie@ucalgary.ca.
Anita McDonaldSchool of Public Policy and Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProject Colourful, an innovative model for delivering team-based care and improving access to family physicians at a specific Canadian clinic, provided a window on how physician-led primary care teams are evolving. Colourful allowed an action research team to draw out broadly applicable policy lessons as family physicians moved from exclusively 'quarterbacking' direct patient care to also taking on a more off-field role as 'coaches' of registered nurses.

methodsParticipant observations (n = 12) of Colourful's design and implementation were supplemented with semi-structed interviews (n = 11) that focused on the project's origins; plans for scaling; and interprofessional teamwork issues. Transcribed interviews were analysed using an interpretive descriptive approach.

resultsThe shift from quarterback to coach requires not only payment reform, but cultural change and training for physicians and other team members. Specific training here focuses on developing human resource skills and capacities that span: hiring, scope-of practice education, team dynamics, team member retention, and change management.

conclusionsKey support, resource, and governance considerations for policy makers looking to scale care models like Colourful include education to: flatten traditional interprofessional hierarchies; enable the communication required for successful teamwork; as well as, bolster the HR skills of physician coaches; ensure an optimized interprofessional mix; and empower team members to renegotiate scopes of practice at clinical and provincial levels.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamPhysicians, FamilyPhysician's RolePrimary Health CareCanadaGroup DynamicsHealth PolicyHumansInterprofessional RelationsAccessNursePrimary health careTeam-Based care

Identifiers

PMID41620663
PMCPMC12947436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.