Observational studyThe journal of headache and pain2026
Responders and super-responders to atogepant after 24 weeks of treatment in migraine: real-world evidence from the GIANT-2 study.
Observational study in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06136442 (Atogepant in Real Life in Italy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Atogepant in Real Life in Italy
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term safety of CGRP pathway inhibitors in migraine patients with prior cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReal-world evidence on atogepant remains limited. GIANT2 explores the 24-week real-life effectiveness of atogepant in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM) under routine clinical conditions.
methodsGIANT2 is a 24-week, prospective, multicenter, real-world, study including consecutive patients with HFEM or CM with ≥3 preventive treatment failures, treated with atogepant 60 mg once daily. Co-primary endpoints: proportions achieving ≥50% and ≥75% reductions in monthly migraine days for HFEM or monthly headache days for CM at weeks 21–24 versus baseline. Secondary endpoints: changes in migraine/headache days, analgesic intake, pain intensity, disability, patient global impression of change, 100% response rates, tolerability and safety. Response rates at weeks 21–24 were also evaluated in patients with prioranti-CGRP mAb failure. Exploratory analyses: proportion of >50% responders achieving >30% reduction in NRS scores and response rates in subgroups combining psychiatric comorbidities, CM, and medication overuse headache (MOH).
resultsOf 233 patients enrolled, 156 completed >24 weeks of treatment, with 37.2% having failed prior anti-CGRP mAbs. At weeks 21–24, 76.9% achieved a ≥ 50% response and 45.5% a ≥ 75% response, with ≥50% response more frequent in HFEM than CM (p = 0.005). A 100% response occurred in 5.1% of patients. All secondary endpoints improved significantly (p < 0.001) with greater benefits at week 24 than week 12. No difference in effectiveness was observed between mAb-naïve patients and those with prior mAb failures, who achieved ≥50% and ≥75% response rates of 70.7% and 39.7%. A combined ≥50% frequency reduction and ≥30% pain reduction was achieved by 54.5% of patients. Among patients with psychiatric comorbidities, 63.0% were ≥50% responders, while among CM patients rates were 62.1% in those with MOH and 40.0% in those with both psychiatric comorbidities and MOH (≥75% responder rates 42.4%, 37.0%, and 28.0%). Adverse events occurred in 11.2% of patients and led to discontinuation in 1.3%.
conclusionsGIANT2 shows that atogepant effectiveness increases from week 12 to 24 with a high proportion of responders and super-responders regardless of prior anti-CGRP mAb failure and reduces pain intensity in residual headaches in most patients. It is also effective in migraine subgroups combining psychiatric comorbidities, CM and MOH.
trial registrationNCT06136442.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.