ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
A machine learning model for the early prediction of Gram-negative bloodstream infection in ICU patients.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI) can induce fatal septic shock. Moreover, the increasingly severe problem of antimicrobial resistance has led to high clinical mortality, particularly among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The early identification of pathogens and timely antibiotic therapy are critical for patient outcomes. However, conventional diagnostic methods like blood culture are time-consuming and can delay treatment. Furthermore, the implementation of molecular detection techniques in routine laboratories is often hindered by high costs and technical complexity. Machine learning (ML) offers a promising alternative for the early prediction of GN-BSI. This study aims to develop an early prediction model for GN-BSI by integrating clinical and laboratory parameters from ICU patients using machine learning algorithms, thereby assisting in the early diagnosis and treatment of GN-BSI.
methodsThis retrospective study utilized data from ICU patients admitted to the West District of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January and July 2025. Following data preprocessing and multiple imputation of missing values, the dataset was randomly divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Feature selection was performed using Lasso regression and multivariate logistic regression. Seven ML models were developed and evaluated using metrics including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Model interpretability was further assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis.
resultsThis study ultimately included 405 ICU patients. Following further feature selection, four variables were identified, including deep vein catheterization, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Early prediction models for GN-BSI in ICU patients were constructed using seven machine learning algorithms. Among these models, the XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance, with an AUC value of 0.898, accuracy of 88.43%, F1-score of 0.783, PPV of 85.00%, and NPV of 89.10%. SHAP bar and beeswarm plots illustrated the contribution of the four variables to the outcome. The SHAP dependency plot and force analysis provided model interpretability at the factor level and individual level, respectively.
conclusionsWe developed, evaluated, and interpreted a machine learning model for predicting GN-BSI in ICU patients, which may facilitate timely intervention and treatment. The XGBoost model shows potential for clinical application following internal validation and further refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.