ReviewSkeletal radiology2026
Surgical management and imaging evaluation of post-traumatic periscaphoid osteoarthritis (SLAC and SNAC wrists).
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An untreated scapholunate interosseous ligament injury or scaphoid nonunion leads to progressive post-traumatic periscaphoid osteoarthritis and carpal collapse. Symptomatic forms, known as scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) or scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC), are common and disabling, requiring surgical management. Numerous operative options exist depending on the stage of collapse and the extent of joint involvement. We apply a modified Watson radiological classification consisting of four stages of pancarpal collapse, integrating the etiological origin (SLAC or SNAC) and the arthritic progression pattern. This review summarizes current surgical principles for each stage of the disease and highlights the key role of imaging in postoperative assessment. Radiography remains the first-line tool to evaluate carpal alignment and implant positioning. CT and CBCT provide high-resolution analysis of bony structures and fixation devices, while ultrasound enables dynamic evaluation of superficial soft tissues and implant-tendon relationships without metallic artifacts. MRI, despite its sensitivity for soft tissues and bone marrow, remains limited by metal-induced distortion. A comprehensive understanding of surgical techniques, biomechanical principles, and implant types is essential to accurately interpret postoperative outcomes and detect complications early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41620585What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.