ArticleScientific reports2026
Changes in EGFR activity following CRISPR/Cas9-editing of the EGF binding domain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Elevated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) expression is observed in most cervical cancers, and it is frequently associated with poor clinical outcomes. The limited efficacy of existing EGFR-targeted therapies in cervical cancer highlights the need for a deeper understanding of EGFR role in this cancer type. To investigate EGFR separately from its interaction with Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), we removed the key amino acids from the ligand bindings site. We used CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to generate a panel of EGFR mutant cell lines and then sequenced and characterized them in detail. Studying the phenotypes of mutant cell clones, we show that a pair of amino acid substitutions L14R and Y45M within Domain I of EGFR protein completely disrupts EGF binding and changes EGFR subcellular distribution. A single substitution Y45M significantly reduced EGF binding but did not lead to subcellular redistribution of EGFR. Upon editing, EGFR mRNA and protein expression were decreased in mutant clones compared to wild type cells. Genome wide profiling of different CRISPR/Cas9 clones confirmed correct editing of EGFR with no off target CRISPR/Cas9 generated mutations. At the same time, spontaneous mutations that could impact cell phenotypes were detected in mutant clones. Disruption of ligand binding domain of EGFR by sequential knock in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing altered subcellular localization and phosphorylation of EGFR in cervical cancer cells. The results presented here provide insights that may accelerate the development of CRISPR/Cas9-based therapies for EGFR-dependent cancers and reinforce the importance of thorough evaluation of CRISPR/Cas9-generated phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.