Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41620508›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Knowledge-grounded large language model for personalized sports training plan generation.

Zhongliang He, Jiacheng Wang, Binggang Zhang, Yang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhongliang HePhysical Education Department, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jiacheng WangPhysical Education Department, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Binggang ZhangPhysical Education Department, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. pkdsi577590@outlook.com.
Yang LiPhysical Education Department, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing demand for scientifically grounded and highly personalized fitness plans reveals the huge shortcomings of traditional recommender systems, which cannot overcome template-oriented methods and effectively cope with complex, dynamic user data. As a remedy for this shortcoming, this work utilizes a Large Language Model (LLM) augmented with a domain-specific knowledge graph to develop LLM-SPTRec, a novel framework for intelligent sports training plan generation. This model successfully integrates multi-source heterogeneous user data and enhances the personalization and scientific validity of recommendations by grounding the LLM’s generative process in an expert-elicited Sports Science Knowledge Graph (SSKG). Empirical results on a real-world dataset demonstrate that LLM-SPTRec surpasses traditional baselines—including collaborative filtering, sequential models, and general-purpose LLMs—on fundamental measures of plan coherence, goal relevance, and predicted user satisfaction. The findings of this research provide a new paradigm for the discipline of intelligent health by bridging the gap between big data analysis and expert knowledge in addition to providing a new direction for the overall field of applied AI by demonstrating that knowledge-based LLMs are capable of generating safe, effective, and scientific personal health recommendations.

Indexed as

SportsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language ModelsDynamic user profilingKnowledge graphLarge language modelsPersonalized healthRecommender systemsSports science

Identifiers

PMID41620508
PMCPMC12916763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.